Orange County NC Website
24 <br /> • Engage with Durham County on economic development around the <br /> Woodmont and Gateway Stations <br /> O Light Rail Cost Sharing Agreement <br /> • Review every four years with the update of each County's Transit Plan <br /> O Annual Work Plans <br /> • Describe program of capital and operating improvements using transit <br /> tax funds <br /> • Presented to Board of Commissioners each Spring <br /> Chair Dorosin said the version at the Commissioners' places is redlined, and asked who <br /> made these edits. <br /> Travis Myren said GoTriangle led these changes at the request of the Commissioners <br /> involved in the negotiations. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs referred to the position in #4, and said it was not recommended <br /> to go to the MPO, but rather merited further discussion. <br /> John Talmadge said this was a mistake, and it will be discussed further. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs referred to #7, and asked if there is a reason for the change in <br /> language. He said the commissioners specifically wanted it to read that every four years the <br /> County Commissioners would review the cost split. <br /> John Talmadge said the red line version is the latest working document. <br /> Commissioner Rich agreed with Commissioner Jacobs, and said she would like to see <br /> this position work with the Council of Governments (COG), as opposed to the MPO. <br /> Chair Dorosin asked if there is a reason for the deletion in bullet point 1 referring to <br /> environmental impacts. <br /> Katharine Eggleston said it was duplicative, and the same language appears in the <br /> paragraph above. <br /> Travis Myren resumed the PowerPoint presentation: <br /> Bus Service Expansion <br /> O Financial model may support some additional bus expansion <br /> O Allocation of bus hours governed by Implementation Agreement <br /> • 64% Chapel Hill Transit <br /> • 24% GoTriangle <br /> • 12% Orange Public Transit <br /> O Potential Renegotiation of Agreement <br /> • Bus hours allocation <br /> • Bus service planning <br /> • Disposition of the potential rail dividend <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said he is supportive of this. He said when this agreement was <br /> negotiated there was not a transportation department, plan or funding. He said the County <br /> was usually just a pass through, and Chapel Hill had more funding. He asked if, going <br /> forward, GoTriangle wants to commit its staff to the same process that the County is <br /> committing its staff. <br /> John Talmadge said yes GoTriangle is willing to enter into a renegotiation, and he has <br /> reached out to the MPO and the Town of Chapel Hill. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs suggested putting some time parameters on a start date, and <br /> said it should start in this calendar year or fiscal year. <br />