Browse
Search
Minutes 04-20-2017
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
Minutes - Approved
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Minutes 04-20-2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2017 9:06:50 AM
Creation date
5/22/2017 9:04:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/20/2017
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Minutes
Document Relationships
Agenda - 04-20-2017 - Agenda
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 04-20-2017 - Work Session
Agenda - 04-20-2017 - 1 - Discussion Regarding the Draft Durham – Orange Light Rail Cost Sharing Agreement and Draft Orange County Transit Plan
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\BOCC Agendas\2010's\2017\Agenda - 04-20-2017 - Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
20 <br /> Commissioner McKee asked if the FCC is under any contractual agreement to raise <br /> $100 million. <br /> Katharine Eggleston said no. She said if state funding decreased, the parties would <br /> meet to see if there are alternative funds that can fill the gap, and the FCC funds may fill such <br /> a need. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked how the BOCC would remove itself from the project, if the <br /> unilateral withdrawal language is removed, and the state funding drops to 5% and the BOCC <br /> no does not want to absorb the additional 5%. <br /> Katharine Eggleston said there may be funds from the FCC, and there may be cost <br /> cutting strategies. <br /> Commissioner McKee asked what options there would be if the BOCC does not agree <br /> with the cost cutting measures, such as removing a stop in Orange County. <br /> Tammy Bouchelle said the BOCC is not obligated to submit any additional funds under <br /> this agreement. She said any substantial change to the project, such as removing a stop, <br /> would have to be approved by the FTA prior to proceeding. She said the Counties would also <br /> have to approve such a change in the County transit plans. She said GoTriangle has no <br /> ability to act unilaterally. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he does not understand what happens if a scenario arises <br /> that Orange County cannot accommodate; when it has signed an agreement to the plan, FTA <br /> has approved the project, and the state says it will only give 5%. He says without a unilateral <br /> withdrawal provision, he feels Orange County is bound to commit funds. <br /> Katharine Eggleston said should such a scenario arise, the three parties would make <br /> good faith efforts to find strategies that would be amendable to three parties. <br /> Commissioner McKee said there may be no such strategies. <br /> Chair Dorosin proposed the hypothetical of cutting one of the Orange County stations, <br /> and asked if staff could walk the Board through the steps of what would happen. <br /> Tammy Bouchelle said if there are significant changes in the scope of the project, the <br /> FTA would have to approve them. She said the removal of a station would be an example of <br /> such a change. <br /> Chair Dorosin proposed the hypothetical of all parties approving of the station removal, <br /> and asked if the steps thereafter could be identified. <br /> Tammy Bouchelle said the FTA would be informed of this decision, and additional <br /> studies would be needed to show there were no negative social justice, environmental or <br /> ridership impacts. She said after receiving approval from the FTA, GoTriangle would need the <br /> approvals of Orange and Durham counties, with the change being reflected in the County <br /> transit plans. <br /> Chair Dorosin proposed the scenario where the BOCC does not want to remove a <br /> station from the line, and does not want to amend its transit plan. He asked if the steps <br /> thereafter could be described. He asked what would happen if Durham and Orange counties <br /> disagree on the cost cutting measure. <br /> Commissioner McKee said his concern is what happens if there is an impasse, and the <br /> parties do not agree. <br /> Chair Dorosin said if an agreement and transit plan amendment are required to <br /> proceed, but do not happen, then how does the project proceed. <br /> Patrick McDonough said in the draft plan, there is an appendix B of mitigation <br /> measures. He said the removal of a station is an unlikely scenario of a cost cutting measure. <br /> He said there are items in the plan that can be cut down in price without the customer being <br /> affected; for example, a bridge can be made more ugly. He said, conversely, there are areas <br /> that can be cut that do affect the customer, such as the capacity for the speed of the trains. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.