Agenda - 03-02-2006-7a - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

z 4) some limited boundaries and statistical information showing the population distribution as it may relate to the consideration/formulation of district representation for Orange County. The report was intended to provide an initial framework of information upon which the Board of Commissioners could deliberate and determine as appropriate any further steps in evaluating this issue and responding to the request and petition submitted. The Board then pursued a series of meetings over the past nine months, Those meetings included two public hearings, one on August 24 and the other on August 31, 2005, to receive input from the public on this issue, The Board then discussed, at an October 17, 2005 work session, five initial draft maps/plans, an introductory preamble, a draft set of Principles, and a draft Process/Timetable, From that meeting, the Board scheduled and conducted a public hearing at its November 2, 2005 regular meeting on three of the initial draft maps/plans, The next discussion occurred at the Board's November 15, 2005 regular meeting, At that meeting, the Board determined that it would like to invest more time at a work session far specific discussion of the issues and possibilities associated with the district election of commissioners, The Board did approve a motion at the meeting ".,.[to] pursue a district election system and have a referendum in the general election of 2006 on the map that the Board of Commissioners adopt." The Board also briefly discussed district elections at the January 20, 2006 BOCC Retreat as part of the "Priorities' review, and members of the Board indicated an interest in reaching a conclusion on district elections discussions with two additional meetings, if possible. The most recent discussion occurred at a February 16, 2006 work session, during which the Board decided: 1) there would be a total of 5 members on the Board in a district plan submitted to the voters; 2) the district map/plan would be the one designated as "Proposal 5", with one member from District 1 (all of the County except Chapel Hill Township); two members from District 2 (encompassing Chapel Hill Township); and two At-t_arge members; 3) members elected from District 1 and District 2 must reside in their respective District, but the qualified voters of the entire County would nominate all candidates for and elect all members of the Board; 4) confirmed that a referendum on "Proposal 5" along with related items would occur in November 2006 (As noted above, the Board, at its November 75, 2005 regular meeting, had already determined to have "a referendum in the general election of 20Qti on the map and plan that the Board of Commissioners adopt'; 5) confirmed that implementation of the district election plan for the Board of County Commissioners, with the approval of County voters in November 2006, would begin with the 2008 Primary Election. Tonight's meeting provides the opportunity far public comment on the February 16, 2006 decision of the Board and on district elections for the Board of County Commissioners. To initiate an alteration in the structure of the Board, the Board must adopt a Resolution as prescribed by N,C. Gen.. Stat. § 153A-60.. The Resolution must: 1) briefly but completely describe the proposed alterations; 2) prescribe the manner of transition from the existing structure to the altered structure;