Orange County NC Website
simulation modeling) that the proposal should actually work. As of March 15~, Mebane <br />and its consulting engineer have submitted the required engineering calculation and <br />modeling and a formal statement of Mebane's intent to make those improvements that <br />have been show to be efficacious by those calculations. <br />3 <br />County staff has, as of March 15~, been advised of yet another somewhat problematic and <br />heretofore unknown requirement by CGLS staff, CGLS staff has indicated that it will not review <br />Mebane's latest submittal or any more material or documents submitted by the County or the <br />City of Mebane until we submit a complete package of information that includes all pertinent <br />documentation, That package must include revised plans and specifications (either showing <br />the reduced-scope project broken out of the STAG funding process or containing those STAG <br />related revisions that have been required by CGLS), a plan (with supporting documentation) to <br />improve the existing Mebane infrastructure and the County's formal letter of intent to <br />reconfigure the existing STAG funded project, However, significant additional project delays <br />consequent to this requirement can be minimized once the BQCC makes the decision to move <br />forward with an expedited locally funded project. Plans and specifications showing the reduced <br />scope project and the County's letter of intent (to reconfigure the project) can be readied and <br />submitted very quickly. CGLS should then be able to make its decision on the adequacy of <br />Mebane's infrastructure improvement plan (approving the County's plans and specs should be <br />a essentially a pro forma process), If Mebane's plans are approved, CGLS authorization to <br />advertise the project for bidders within five days of the County's formal statement of its intent to <br />reconfigure the STAG project and the actual advertisement could published within a week of <br />CGLS authorization to advertise. Should Mebane's plan not be approved, the project would be <br />delayed until a satisfactory plan is developed and approved. <br />The following attachments related to the Buckhorn EDD/Gravelly Hill Middle School Water and <br />Sewer Extension project have been provided for the Board's information <br />Attachment 1 -This 3/2/06 memorandum from County Engineer Paul Thames details the <br />actions that have been taken to date, and the actions that remain to be done. <br />Attachment 2 -This is a draft letter (as explained in the memorandum) that the County needs <br />to send to the State/Construction Grants & Loans Section (CGLS). It is proposed that the Chair <br />be authorized to sign this letter contingent upon 1) written assurance from the State/CGLS that <br />the actions being taken will not affect the STAG grant, and 2) confirmation from Congressman <br />David Price's office that his office does not believe that the actions being taken will adversely <br />affect the STAG grant. <br />Attachment 3 -This letter and report demonstrates that the City of Mebane has followed <br />through in its efforts to satisfy the requests that the State has detailed. In the letter, Mebane <br />confirms its plans to upgrade the sewer facilities and lines as required by the State. The <br />County's project engineering consultants and the County Engineer have reviewed the Mebane <br />engineer's pumping and flaw analysis report and find it to be technically sound. It also should <br />be noted that the County Attorney and the Mebane City Attorney are currently working through <br />the legal framework that had been agreed to in principle by the County and Gity. <br />Attachment 4 -This 3/1/06 email from Cecil Madden with the State/CGLS demonstrates the <br />manifest difficulty we have encountered in working with the State/CGLS on this project, <br />