Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-29-2002 - 3b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Agenda - 04-29-2002
>
Agenda - 04-29-2002 - 3b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/10/2017 12:06:38 PM
Creation date
5/10/2017 12:05:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/29/2002
Meeting Type
Assembly of Government
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
3b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20020429
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
While only the Board of County Commissioners can declare what the County's policy <br /> position is on any given subject, 1 will attempt to articulate what 1 might.suggest that the <br /> County Manager recommend to the Board in this regard. <br /> The Interlocal Agreement was conceived and developed pursuant to the fundamental <br /> principle that all parties to the agreement would pledge their wastes to the waste <br /> management system. This founding tenet was significant because wastes delivered to the <br /> system's facilities were understood to form the financial basis for all system <br /> services/programs. I believe that it is welldocumented in the public record that Orange <br /> County would not have agreed to take on responsibility for the entire solid waste system <br /> without having a guarantee from its municipal partners that they would ensure that all <br /> elements of the waste stream then under their control would continue to flow to the <br /> Orange County Landfill. All parties to the Agreement understood this financial reality, <br /> which is explicitly articulated in the document. <br /> On page 3, Section 2 of the Interlocal Agreement, under the heading "The Parties will <br /> deliver Solid Waste and County Recyclables to the System", the Agreement says "The <br /> County and the Towns all agree to deliver, or cause to be delivered, to System <br /> Management Facilities for disposal or processing, respectively, all Solid Waste and <br /> County Recyclables under their respective control. This delivery obligation includes <br /> (without limitation) all Solid Waste and County Recyclables collected by any Party's <br /> employees, Solid Waste collection contractors, solid waste collection licensees or solid <br /> waste collection franchisees. " <br /> In view of this provision and the overarching financial realities that led to its inclusion in <br /> the agreement, 1 remain confident that all parties to the Agreement will continue to honor <br /> their commitment to the County and the other signatories to the Agreement who rely on <br /> the revenue generated by the pledges of waste. <br /> 3. How much of current fee revenue is dedicated to recycling? <br /> For FY 2000101 the total recycling budget (minus overhead)for all of Orange County <br /> was$2,049,000. Of this amount over half($1,298,364) is estimated to be the value of <br /> both residential and non-residential services provided by the County to the Town of <br /> Chapel Hill(based in part on share of the overall County population). Of this nearly <br /> $1.3 million in total recycling and waste reduction services provided by the landfill <br /> enterprise fund to the Town, it is estimated that non-residential services account for <br /> about$888,672. Based on the notion that approximately 113 of MSW revenues are <br /> attributable to recycling and waste reduction services, and that the Town's non- <br /> residential tipping fee revenue is$568,596, it appears that the Town actually pays about <br /> $189,443 for its$888,672 worth of services. <br /> While not intended to be a finely honed analysis of the programs, we believe it is a <br /> reliable estimate. This being the case, it is apparent that Chapel Hill receives <br /> considerably more in recycling services than it contributes in tipping fee revenue. This is <br /> possible because of the subsidy provided by the private commercial sector and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.