Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-27-2017 - 1 - Consideration of the Final Draft Durham – Orange Light Rail Cost Sharing Agreement and Final Draft Orange County Transit Plan
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 04-27-2017 - Work Session
>
Agenda - 04-27-2017 - 1 - Consideration of the Final Draft Durham – Orange Light Rail Cost Sharing Agreement and Final Draft Orange County Transit Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/26/2017 4:06:16 PM
Creation date
4/26/2017 3:11:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/27/2017
Meeting Type
Work Session
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
1
Document Relationships
2017-153 Co. Mgr. - GoTriangle - Interlocal Agreement for Cost Sharing for the Durham-Orange Light Rail Transit Project
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Contracts and Agreements\General Contracts and Agreements\2010's\2017
Minutes 04-27-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
208
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
46 <br /> Orange County Transit Plan April 25, 2017 <br /> No federal funds are assumed to cover the costs of new or Now, state funding for the project is programmed in the State <br /> replacement vehicles for any of the transit providers. Transportation Improvement Program at 91.5 percent of the <br /> project cost. The remaining 8.5 percent is to be funded by Tax <br /> District Revenues. <br /> In 2013, the State of North Carolina passed the Strategic L_ <br /> Transportation Investments law that changed how - - - - - --- <br /> transportation funding decisions are made. The 2013 law The N-S BRT Project is planned to be funded through a <br /> created a 10 percent cap on the use of "regional tier" funding combination of Tax District Revenues and federal funds. <br /> for transit projects in any 7-year Transportation Improvement <br /> Program, limiting the availability of state revenues to an <br /> amount lower than assumed in the 2012 Plan. <br /> The 2012 Plan assumed the federal government would be a <br /> To address these changes, the 2017 Plan does not assume any significant funding partner for the N-S BRT Project at a 50 <br /> state revenues will be available for bus capital projects, percent share of total costs.Though changes were made to the <br /> meaning that Tax District Revenues will need to fund a higher federal transportation funding law, it authorized continued <br /> share of these projects. funding through 2020 for the Capital Improvement Grant <br /> program, which is assumed to be an essential funding source <br /> For new and replacement vehicles, Chapel Hill Transit and OPT for the BRT project. The Small Starts section of this grant <br /> now assume that the Tax District Revenues will cover 100 program would allow up to 80 percent of project costs, $100 <br /> percent of the costs. GoTriangle assumes the Tax District million, to be paid through the federal grant. In order to <br /> Revenues will cover 90 percent of the costs, with the remaining improve the competitiveness of the project for this funding,the <br /> 10 percent funded by state grants. 2017 Plan assumes that the N-S BRT Project will receive 70 <br /> percent of its funding from the federal government. <br /> The 2012 Plan also assumed the State would be a significant <br /> The Hillsborough Train Station project was assumed to be funding partner for the N-S South BRT Project at a 25 percent <br /> funded 80 percent by federal grants, 10 percent by state grants, share of the total costs,just as it had done for Charlotte for the <br /> and 10 percent by Tax District Revenues. construction of their two light rail projects. North Carolina's <br /> Strategic Transportation Investments law created a scoring <br /> Final Page 22 of 65 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.