Agenda - 12-05-1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

....„ - _ - - 2i , 1 .. November 29, 1983 -3- County Manager 2. Plan Bevies, & A..rovel One and one-half (11/2) hours per site. Due to more and higher standards for erosion control and stormwater management, plan reviell, will be more extensive. Calculations of runoff supplied by the owner Or his surveyor must be verified. Plans must also be reviewed to determine tat control measures proposed will limit stormwater discharges ' to pre-development levels and that erosion will be contained within areas designated for land disturbance. The estimate of time for plan review and approval is based on the Erosion Control Officer's prior experience and includes that time necessary to prepare and issue grading permits, establish files, etc. .._ 1 3. Site Inspections - Ohs-half (1/2) hour per site. Site inspections will take less time than the initial inspection, since the ErosionControl Officer j has familiarity with the property and approved plans. Three (3) visits are made te each site to see if control measures are installed and containing erosion. 4. Travel - T ill enty (20) minutes .er site ins.ection tri.. Travel to the UniversitylLake Watershed would be scheduled in such a manner to inspect as Many sites in that area as possible in one trip: Traveling the 50-mile round-tripldistance would take approximately one (1) hour. Travel time between sites would be approximately 10 minutes due to their scattered location. From four (4) to eight (8) inspections per day could be made, depending ,pon whether they were "initial" or "follow-up" site visits. The travel time between sites would thus vary 30 to 70 minutes per day. In total, all travel would average 20 minutes per site inspection per day. Given the amourft of time necessary for each activity, certain assumptions had to be made to estimate the annual time requirements for administering the higher erosion control standards in University Lake watershed. The assumptions used are as follows: i 1. AS mentioned previously, initial site inspections would be required of all sites ekcepi for Mobile;hoMes'being-located in'parks. Alabile home parks are either existing or receive approval of erosion control plans through another procedure. Individual units are moved to a prepared site and little or no land disturbing activity is involved. All other sites involve either clearance or land disturbance or both and would require at least an initial site inspection. 2. All singlefamily and individual Mobile home sitea would require plan review and'approval. Single-family and commercial alterations., and accessory uses were not inluded, since land disturbing activities would be minimal and cat- egorized as !exemptions. A question existed as to whether all single-family and mobile homes should be included, since some sites might fall within the exemption grianted under Section 6.1.b.(1) - land disturbing activities which would not result in the uncovering of more than 10,000 sq. ft. , On November L.8, 1983, the Erosion Control Officer traveled all roads within the University Lake watershed area and identified nine (9) sites on which building permits bad been issued and homes were under construction or sites cleared for that purpos . The average a:mound of land area disturbed on these home its is as follows: i I