Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-07-1983
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Agenda - 11-07-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2017 12:17:09 PM
Creation date
4/24/2017 12:05:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/7/1983
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19831107
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a• <br /> Ci <br /> a, 3• <br /> 9' [l <br /> costs to the community which are nowhere discussed in <br /> the report: pressure on already strained public services <br /> thereby reducing their quality, crowding, 'noise, pollution, <br /> crime, and stress on the fragile Eno River ecosystem which <br /> is threatened today by the encroachment of development and <br /> the removal of water for residential and commercial use. <br /> It is well—known that northern Orange County has one of <br /> the highest employment rates in the United States, the result <br /> in no small part of its economic base in education, health <br /> care delivery and other service activities. What possible <br /> advantages to the present citizenry can further industrialization <br /> bring? A more stable economy? Not when you are the most <br /> stable economy in the country. Better paying jobs? Not <br /> likely when wages in service sections are rising more rapidly <br /> than in manufacturing! A better relationship between people <br /> and natural resources? Not when the pressure is already clearly <br /> visible on water, sewer, and transportation facilities. <br /> Clearly some land owners may benefit from the land use <br /> assum d in this report. But who else? Will this change <br /> take place at the expense of the quality of life of other <br /> citizens of the county? The planning report should tell us. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.