Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
{ <br /> 04 <br /> indicated this would be the only reason for emergency need of <br /> public services. Shanklin suggested deleting the phrase "due <br /> to poor soils". Walters suggested using "for example" before <br /> "due to poor soils". <br /> MOTION: Gordon moved to delete the phrase. <br /> VOTE: Pilkey abstained. <br /> Seven members were in favor of leaving the statement in the <br /> objective. <br /> Motion failed. <br /> On page 23, Greenberg requested adding "and highway" to make <br /> revision read: "Develop and train a response team and other <br /> emergency personnel in railway and highway accident procedure <br /> particularly where hazardous materials are involved." <br /> Pilkey added "the study area" to objective: "To provide for <br /> adequate level of fire protection through the study area". <br /> On page 24, under Environmental Concerns Recommended Action: <br /> Greenberg felt the last two were the focus of the Watershed I <br /> Sub-Committee, including "Development and enforcement of stoi <br /> management requirements for new development activity," and "I <br /> on-site infiltration of runoff associated with new developmei <br /> Pearson, noting the last line on page 26, "Residential proper <br /> within the area are not suited for commercial development",. <br /> this statement was included as these areas could be consider( <br /> appropriate for commercial use. Collins responded the states <br /> should begin "Existing residential properties . . . ." Smiti <br /> noted that it was the desire of the community to be protecte' <br /> and not be considered for commercial or industrial use. Shl <br /> also noted the Board of Commissioners had deleted these area <br /> from the activity node under the adopted Land Use Plan. <br /> MOTION: Pearson moved for deletion of the last sentence. "Residentia <br /> properties within the area are not suited for commercial devi <br /> meet". <br /> Seconded by Bacon. <br /> Gordon noted this was included based on input from residents <br /> the area. <br /> VOTE: In favor: Bacon, Pearson, Shanklin <br /> Opposed: Irvin, Allison, Gordon, Greenberg, Pilkey, Walters <br /> Motion failed. <br /> On page 28, Walters noted the date should be November 22, 19 <br /> instead of 1983. <br />