Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-22-1983
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Agenda - 08-22-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 8:58:28 AM
Creation date
4/24/2017 10:33:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/22/1983
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19830822
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
-2- <br /> • Some of us Ideny that the lakes face any water quality problems. Some <br /> of us say, 1"The fish are healthy. The algae are healthy. The public <br /> is healthy; and the public is happy." <br /> 1 <br /> • Some of us say, "There's no problem, because there's no smoking gun." <br /> • We may not have a smoking gun yet; but we have a loaded gun, and <br /> it's readylto go off. <br /> • Statisticsifrom NRCD indicate that Falls and Jordan are already overloaded <br /> with nutrients that will cause nuisance algae blooms in the future. <br /> These lake receive the runoff and effluent from one of the most <br /> prosperousland rapidly growing areas of the Southeast. That growth <br /> will mean even more pollution than we have right now. <br /> • We must make every effort to disarm that loaded gun - one chamber <br /> at a time, ! if necessary. Painful as it may be, we have to make <br /> the tough decisions, and start solving our problems today: <br /> 1 <br /> • We must put together a careful and deliberate plan of action that <br /> guaranteesithe long-term protection of both lakes. Certain actions <br /> are neededlnow, others will be needed in 3, 6, or maybe 12 months. <br /> But each one should be part of a carefully planned network of state, <br /> local , andIprivate sector actions. And each one must be based on <br /> cost, equity, and effectiveness. <br /> • Triangle J supports NRCD's proposal to upgrade certain Class C <br /> waters of Falls and Jordan to A-11 or B. We consider A-II as a water <br /> quality goal - and not an endorsement of Jordan Lake's present condition. <br /> • We support the designation of both watersheds as Nutrient Sensitive; <br /> but, we urge the EMC to be fair and deliberate in assigning phosphorus <br /> removal requirements to wastewater dischargers. <br /> • We support the phosphorus strategy proposed for Jordan Lake, except <br /> that the Haw River and New Hope arms should be treated in the same <br /> way. Dischargers to the Haw River Arm should be subject to the same <br /> phosphorus' requirements that NRCD is recommending for the New Hope. <br /> 1 <br /> • We supportIthe phosphorus strategy proposed for Falls Lake. <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br /> • All new dischargers in both Falls and Jordan watersheds should be <br /> subject to stringent phosphorus removal requirements, and should be <br /> encouraged to use non-discharging wastewater systems. <br /> • We may not1 be able to eliminate all the existing pollution sources, <br /> but we can! certainly try to limit any new ones. <br /> • Even with these added control measures, Triangle J is not convinced <br /> that the EMC's classification system will really assure the long-term <br /> quality of1 Falls and Jordan Lakes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.