Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
Sri <br />COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS/DEVED)PPM -IMPACT'S -- -FFWLAND TRACT <br />CHARACIERISTIC <br />R -1 <br />R -4 <br />Land area <br />Street B/W Area <br />3.01 acres <br />.33 acres <br />3.01 acresu <br />.56 acres <br />Net Development Area <br />(11;1 %) <br />2.58 acres <br />(22:0 %) <br />2.35 acres <br />Lot Area/Dwelling <br />40,000 sq. ft. <br />10,000 sq. ft. <br />10 <br />„. <br />7.'. <br />Allowable Dwelling Units <br />2 <br />X1.26 <br />Density (Dwellings /Acre) (3) <br />Estimated Trips/twelling <br />.75 <br />8.87 <br />9.72 <br />, <br />Traffic Generation <br />Water/Sewage plow/Dwelling (4) <br />18 Or <br />400 gpd <br />98 AD s <br />400 gpd <br />Net Water /Sewage Flow <br />Project Student Population (5) <br />800 gpd <br />4 <br />110o0gpd <br />22 € <br />Elementary <br />2 <br />11 <br />Middle <br />1 <br />Jr. High <br />I <br />Sr. High <br />Recreation Area Required <br />N/A <br />Nj3 <br />Source Notes: (1) Based on percentages taken from subdivisions of caTparable lot size. <br />(2) Land area available after deduction of land required for recreational use by LUI -Land Use Intensity System <br />(3) Maricopa County 'Trip Generation Study <br />(4) John McAdams CcaTpany <br />(5) 2.8 persons/household = 80% of hoe High ehol h school )children (% Distribution - 50% �ementasy; <br />RL� <br />G� <br />CF' <br />