Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-22-1983
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Agenda - 08-22-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 8:58:28 AM
Creation date
4/24/2017 10:33:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/22/1983
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19830822
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
b I 1 <br /> 1 <br /> v| \ augu <br /> o[� � MINUTES A�- � y August 22, 1983 <br /> KV - <br /> \\ ' �be nr�n�e coout� �oacd ot Commissioners met in a special joint public <br /> � � l \ <br /> hearing with the Orange County Planning Board on Monday, August 22, 1983, at <br /> 7"30 P.M. in the Superior Courtroom, Orange County Courthouse, Hillsborough, <br /> North Carolina. <br /> Commissioners Present: Richard E. Whitted, Chair, Commissioners Ben Lloyd, <br /> Shirley E. Marshall, Norman Walker and Don Willhoit. <br /> Planning Board Members Present: oc. Logan Irvin, Chair, and Members George <br /> Allison, Carl Walters, Frank Pearson, Alice Gordon, Nancy Laszlo, David <br /> Shanklin, John Wilson, Tom Bacon and Sharlene gilkey, <br /> Chairman Whitted stated that in accordance with policy, the public hearing <br /> will be chaired by the Chairman of the Planning Department. <br /> D-1 Request by Ky.e-Keog'Rg-sand his wife Guat_-Cbapg for a Rezoning from <br /> Agricultural Residential to Planned Development Industrial and Class A Special <br /> Use Permit (see pages of this book), <br /> Marvin Collins, Director of the Planning oepactmeot stated that Dr. nbYe <br /> Weng Ng and wife have requested a Planned Development-I1 designation for <br /> property located at the southwest corner of the intersection of NC. 86 North <br /> and Coleman Loop Road. A 5.03 acre tract is proposed for a building to be used <br /> for the packaging and production of a sweet and sour sauce, <br /> The present zoning of the property is A-R Agriculture Residential, which <br /> permits agricultural uses and residential development of densities of one unit <br /> per acre. The property to the north is occupied by Major Business Forms, <br /> Incorporated, zoned z-1 Industrial. All other property in this area is zoned <br /> A-R, including a residential area. There are a few single family homes to the <br /> west and east. <br /> The planned development district proposal was established in the Zoning <br /> Ordinance to allow single tracts of land to be planned and developed on a <br /> unified basis. The approach to creating such districts requires rezoning of <br /> the property, the issuance of a special use permit, and the assurance that they <br /> will meet special criteria for planned development within the Zoning Ordinance. <br /> The three (3) criteria for the I-1 Industrial District is set forth in Section <br /> 4.2.2.1. in the Zoning Ordinance: (1) The site must be located within a <br /> Rural Industrial Activity Node. The Orange County adopted Land Use Plan <br /> designates the Coleman Loop Road and NC 86 North intersection as a Rural <br /> Industrial Activity Node; (2) The lot size for individual use must be <br /> appropriate to the method of water supply and sewage disposal. On the five <br /> acre tract the Orange County Health Department has approved the septic tank <br /> system, and a well is proposed; (3) There must be access directly to streets <br /> designated as arterial or collector by the Land Use Plan. NC 86 North has been <br /> designated as an arterial street in the Land Use Plan. <br /> In terms of the general standards with Special Use Permits, the application <br /> must be approved unless it can be shown that the use will not promote the <br /> general health, safety and welfare if location were proposed in accordance with <br /> the plan submitted; if it will not maintain or enhance the value of contiguous <br /> property; if it is not in accordance with the adopted land use plan. <br /> Mr. Collins noted, a number of Planned Development standards applicable to <br /> oc. Weng's situation: (1) concentration of complementary use must be <br /> encouraged; (2) the site must serve as an alternative to strip development; (3) <br /> the minimum lot area is at least two acres; (4) there is a footage requirement <br /> rno c,zo+ °° "+,"o+ mr ns' ~"a A"",",im°,=," 7a7 f°cr ig ","vid~a. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.