Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
'2 - • ■ <br /> C •4- ;• : 41, <br /> It <br /> c e - <br /> •• <br /> . , <br /> . <br /> 03, <br /> Shanklin noted that the intended use is aviation with the normal <br /> uses accessory to the airport facility. <br /> Gordon felt additional, non-accessory uses should be left for subsequent <br /> approval. <br /> Laszlo felt that the area allocated was minimal and posed no real concern. <br /> Pilkey expressed concerns about loopholes in the approval. <br /> Smith again stated that the uses specified on the diagram were normal <br /> accessoryluses. Laszlo asked if there were uses listed that were not <br /> included On the diagram. Smith answered no. Shanklin indicated he was <br /> familiar with the circular on accessory uses land that those specified <br /> on the diagram were appropriate. <br /> Gordon felt the uses should be limited to those specified and that any <br /> other req7eSted use should be considered a modification of the special <br /> use permit. <br /> Smith asked if the specified uses included a plan room. <br /> 1 <br /> MODIFIED Gordon modified the motion to include reference to a plan room as a <br /> MOTION: normalaccessory use. <br /> Laszlo seconded the motion. <br /> VOTE: The motion carried. In favor: Pearson, Pilkey, Irvin, Gordon, Laszlo, <br /> Allison, Walters. Opposed: Shanklin. <br /> Shanklin indicated his opposition was based on the absence from the list <br /> of a use Which would provide hot meals to the facility users. <br />