Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
' L ' .. �;3``,. i <br /> :.z. <br /> v.�• 'e'rr �Y Ie � = .l r 4 .� ��42r' "rl�PLZ ; Y. r F e� ,' �� i�; . � sn�v : -� �'r � + i -.F -.^ :`1 ,� L7rxn; .. , i ti ,.,—.., � , .:4 7.3. -,-L t _ :: ti, - = z...; <br /> 2 o <br /> 30 <br /> 4° Logan Irvin asked if inexperienced pilots need safety precautions? <br /> 5. John Northen: Yes, designed safely. <br /> 6° <br /> Logan Irvin : In Harold Robinsons's letter dated March 5, 1982, to Jim Polatt: <br /> 7• he recommended a 34:1 slope for the approach zone. He also asked what is the <br /> 8• distance from end of the runway. <br /> Logan Iry In : What is the distance from the end of the <br /> I runway to a pine tree <br /> 10• growing at a he i ght of 150' within the approach-departure zone. <br /> 11° John Northlen accepted the commonly referenced 20:1 slope for the approach <br /> 12. departure zone. <br /> 13. Logan Irvin continued his questioning of Northen asking him to make use of <br /> 14.• the submitted data to determine the area into which a tree might intrude. <br /> 15° Northers responded that the intrusions point would depend on the terrain at <br /> 16, the site. <br /> 17° Irvin continued asking how the developer would propose to control natural <br /> 18. obstructions intruding into the approach-departure zone. <br /> 19. Northen responded that the developer had <br /> F proposed in the submitted modification <br /> 20„ request the area that could be controlled. He added that the FM and DOT indicated <br /> 21• that the proposal met their criteria. <br /> 22. John Drake indicated their were long range consequences for the future of <br /> �3• airport proposal� in Orange County. The Assistant of Airport. Planning read <br /> 24. a prepared statem lent which was contained in the Board of Commissioners packet. <br /> 25. He indicated that the AHEC program would not move a substantial number of miles <br /> e <br /> 26. from Horace Williams and added that the Planning Department had misled the <br /> 27., Board of Commissioners. He continued that there was no comparable airport <br /> 28• with similar restrictions as proposed here and that, though listed in the <br /> 29• FAA circular, the il suggested approach-departure, zone was not a practice and <br /> 30. that merely natural obstructions were limited. With regard to the access road, <br /> 31'• Drake indicated ohtainina the rnart ton,.lrJ , - . _ <br />