|
--- .x..57.,--.a
<br /> AS :7441P: . '''''''-;7.--"'7;:ir 74f- U. :-; 1_,-1,. .g..S-F.':';'-- '.-';'.-6;ti."'";- '7-z:,"7:"'".;',"-w•4-5Wr- ,,, - ' --A:'%;-- ::qic::'-'.',.';
<br /> ., -1-1...„,'-, - ..... :::,.r4,,:.,:ir:s.1-4:-;', :is- ',:::,,,.:7if0. 1-,-.]_;- ...., g.;-,,.*:.1.,.:(7-7-: ','=-,,i:,-;:t. ,•:i7: 7-.;`.4-z--72YW'':.';':''.:..+;,s.V4:..,.,-::.-•Ff-,,.-.! ::-,,,o. '7 '.:•.:
<br /> 2'
<br /> — n
<br /> 3.
<br /> 1
<br /> 1
<br /> 4. In conclpsion Mr. Cannity stated that the Planning Staff feels that the
<br /> S. conditions as they exist, have not changed and therefore staff does not feel it
<br /> I
<br /> 6, is necessary Ito modify, amend or delete any of the conditions imposed on the
<br /> I
<br /> 7- approval of le Special Use Permit.
<br /> '
<br /> 8. John Kizer, Planning Board Member, asked if the approach-departure zone shoul
<br /> i
<br /> 9. be a 34:1 slope or 20:1 slope? He added that Bruce Matthews of the North Carolina
<br /> 10. Department of liranspoitation, DiVision of Aviation recommends a 20:1 slope.
<br /> 11. Rick Cannity stated the Planning Staff will check the FM Standards regarding
<br /> 12. the 34:1 slope mentioned in Harold Robinson's letter dated March 5, 1982..
<br /> 13. John Kizer asked how the traffic to the airport would compare to the number 01
<br /> 1
<br /> 1)4., operations at the airport?
<br /> 1
<br /> 15, Rick Cannity responded, saying the Planning Staff used nationally developed
<br /> 16, standards in determining traffic to the airport and also information from Bruce
<br /> 17, Matthews.
<br /> 18. John North. n, Attorney for developers, said the runway could be shortened by
<br /> 19. shifting it. He stated that the affected landowners had been contacted for
<br /> 1
<br /> 20, discussion of the rights-of-way needed to construct the airport. He continued
<br /> 2.1. saying FM says we meet their requirements and the County has the power to impose
<br /> 22. height restrictions through the Airport district, and that it is More reasonable
<br /> I
<br /> 23. for the County to control state designated zone. He further stated they have studio
<br /> 224.. the possibility of fire access road(s) by comparing the original airport proposal
<br /> 25. to the current airport proposal.
<br /> 26. Alice Gordbn, Planning Board Member, asked if easements were required for
<br /> 27, approach-departdre zones? Could developers "get it" (obtain the easements) and
<br /> 28, what efforts travel been made to obtain the easements?
<br /> 29. John Northenl responded, saying letters were sent to each property owner along
<br /> I
<br /> 1
<br /> 30. with a copy of the diagram of affected property asking the landowners to contact
<br /> 31. him to discuss the rights-of-way needed.
<br /> 1
<br />
|