|
.:,-„;',4- •.,,..- ..o::.,....- --41v,7'. .,:.:::,-".'':'''-,L-^.^:''''':'.'■':'":''.i.4' '".1;t.r,;::14.2,1.VI,V,: ;'6.4.4te."i'.ki-81**4i:;1'\''Lii:::7C.''''CI''
<br /> ;■-;:te1/4::-7,`=:,;: , : -1'17--1.'':';'"':•tv1-';.M';j*:•g ‘''' 4''''-..-740,D",\-43-r't-..".--,\Ty:,r:: ':2,-,'::,,7.. .-:?..1 -,:.---. ---X7-...oe t,..,.,.:.:IE:i .c.,,;i:
<br /> -'-'''''''-''77'':-- - .-7,1),.• qc.--;t-'9:. -.'.7:t..T.;'.:.71='...104.' 1:...;";,-;.'. ".•,`I'r. r•. LILL_ 1" ..7.7:1..t*'; A:74.7::''':' ,F--Af-i:1,!;41.%7..,77-:-L.pii.,::' :,:■;`7q..,4, ...
<br /> i," • .7:..;:1,.;',.:i
<br /> •. : ...'N.,•_:.,. ',' ' • -.:.-,"4-gf ,'' '
<br /> PLANNING BOARD' ' Act.lizzi
<br /> ' r Itemao.i: JE
<br /> ACTiON AGEM ril::,1 reSTP\-Cr
<br /> 111:XING EWEZ Adjiu.S.1_11989 - .
<br /> . . ,
<br /> . .
<br /> . .
<br /> Subject: Modification of Class A, Special Use Permit for a Genera/ Aviation Airport
<br /> for Buck Mountain Development Company
<br /> I . .
<br /> ___-_
<br /> [ Public Hearing: yes 1
<br /> [ ElEt?att,717,5n.t: Plannibg
<br /> . _......
<br /> . .
<br /> •
<br /> Attachment(s): SUP Modification Request; Lbcatiou—r--
<br /> M4ii:5/23/83 4:6/27/.83,,O.R... MiAutes;7/18/83 ?re. InfOnvat.ion. Contact: Susan. Smith ' •
<br /> Minute S; DiScushiokhandbut i)O-Sented by irvir ;
<br /> ,
<br /> AssOe;;=:10/15/82 ,
<br /> Ph "Ntnber: 7-32-814 Ext. 349
<br /> zc' /1-47:8,3-1 =fram-Vel-oquin.
<br /> Letter tq Fted Hazard;11/h/g3 Ltt. to Ricbaid.
<br /> Whi'tted; _5/23/a.3. Istt-.,Lttom ',Oeoffrey Oledhill; , _
<br /> . . ... .- . -., ...
<br /> Michrak Air".Port Traffice-hei.'htion ,
<br /> . . •
<br /> PURPOSE: To consideriapp-tovaLlof a request to delete or. mOdify.„Jour (k.) - _
<br /> conditions placed on the approval of the Class A Special Use Permit granted to
<br /> Buck Mountain Development for a general aviation airport.
<br /> I
<br /> ,
<br /> NEED: The September 7, 1982 approval of the proposed Midway Airport by the' Board of
<br /> 1
<br /> Commissioners contained four (4) conditions which Buck Mountain Development
<br /> would like, t6 have deleted or modified. The letter, dated 1-28-83, from
<br /> Mr. John Northen, attorney for the developers, contains the response of the
<br /> applicant tolthe conditions imposed on the approval of the Special Use Permit.
<br /> Four of the conditions were the subject of the public hearing. The developer
<br /> is requesting approval of a,3800' runway with'500' safetyoverrun on.the south
<br /> end and a 700' safety overrun on the north end. In addition, they request that
<br /> condition #2 be modified to include a 1000' long approach-departure zone. The
<br /> applicant has provided a specific list of uses which might take place in the
<br /> Free Base Ope:Itator and maintenance hangars and which they state are for the
<br /> maintenance" of aircraft and operation of the airport. Condition #3 which the
<br /> developers wish to have deleted is the requirement for a fire access road from
<br /> the airport property and Teer Road. The limit placed on training flights in
<br /> Condition #7 is also requested to be deleted. '
<br /> I
<br /> . I
<br /> I
<br /> I
<br /> . ,
<br /> ?ACT; The requested change to Condition #2 will probably require that Orange County
<br /> change its poition concerning development of general aviation airports. Up'
<br /> to this point; Orange County's role has been that of a perthitting agency;
<br /> reviewing and approving plans for the development of public/private airports.
<br /> The County has not attempted to assist such developments through "hazard'
<br /> zoning to control noise, structure height, etc. , nor has it attempted the
<br /> acquisition oil development- of a public airport. It has provided a review
<br /> function rather than intervening directly in such a development.
<br /> One implicatioin of modifying Condition #2 might be to increase pressure on the
<br /> County to assume a more active role in airport development or in providing
<br /> protection to and protection from an airport. Specifically, a reduction in the
<br /> approach-departure zone would leave the County with two alternatives:
<br /> . „
<br /> _
<br />
|