Orange County NC Website
23 <br /> c. Extension of Development of Affordable Housing in Orange County Utilizing <br /> County Owned Property (RFP #5229) Deadline for Submission of Proposals <br /> The Board considered a 60-day extension of the deadline to submit proposals for the <br /> Development of Affordable Housing in Orange County Utilizing County Owned Property <br /> Request for Proposal ("RFP") # 5229 and adopt the revised timeline at Attachment 2. <br /> Travis Myren said when the original timeline was approved in February 2017, staff <br /> envisioned issuing two RFPs: one for the bond funds, and one for a list of 10 County owned <br /> properties that would be available for affordable housing development. He said staff <br /> anticipated these proceeding along the same time line until a couple of weeks ago, when staff <br /> received a request from the Affordable Housing Coalition to extend the RFP deadline for the <br /> County owned properties, while maintaining the RFP deadline for the bond funds. <br /> Travis Myren said the County owned land requires a bit more due diligence than was <br /> originally anticipated. He said the 60-day delay would make these RFPs due at the end of <br /> May, and they would return for the Board's recommended approval at the first meeting in <br /> September. He said the only wrinkle is that there may be projects using County owned land <br /> that also seek bond funds to subsidize the development. He said in this case the Board may <br /> wish to hold back some amount of money at the June approvals. He said alternative-funding <br /> sources could also be pursued. <br /> PUBLIC COMMENT: <br /> Dan Levine said he works with Self Help and is here to speak on behalf of the <br /> Affordable Housing Coalition. He said the extension was requested because the County <br /> owned parcels of land are new to the housing development partner providers, and he said <br /> there is a desire to study the parcels properly and meet the request of the BOCC to collaborate <br /> and be creative. <br /> Commissioner Burroughs said she is in support of this extension. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if applications are still going to be accepted whenever, and <br /> what will happen while waiting on the other applications in June. <br /> Travis Myren said yes, and this will follow the timeline in Attachment 1. He said staff <br /> and stakeholders will evaluate proposals that come in on March 31st, and no time will be lost <br /> on the bond fund portion of this two-phased approach. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if there is a plan for the second phase. <br /> Travis Myren said it would be the same process as the first. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if money will be held back. <br /> Travis Myren said staff will have to discuss what, if any, amount gets held back with the <br /> BOCC when it makes recommendations about the bond funding. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs referred to the idea of holding money back, and asked if this is <br /> $2.5 million. <br /> Travis Myren said the Board may choose not to award the entire $2.5 million in June. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said he would like to have a conversation about a long-term <br /> strategy for the other $2.5 million, since there will probably not be another affordable housing <br /> bond any time soon. He said there is not a lot of leeway in the operating budget, and there will <br /> be a desire to do more projects, but the County must not run out of money. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said he agreed with Commissioner Jacobs, and he said there <br /> was a well-attended presentation about a project that saved a trailer park in Charlottesville, <br /> VA. He said he would like to talk about such an idea here, as well as other creative ideas. <br /> Commissioner Price asked if a decision has been reached about a limit per applicant <br /> for bond funds. <br />