Orange County NC Website
19 <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said there are persuasive arguments for renovating the <br /> existing building, despite how ugly it is. He said he thinks the option for creating affordable <br /> housing is a viable one, but he understands the financial rationale behind renovating the <br /> current EAC. <br /> Commissioner McKee said he agrees with Commissioner Marcoplos that it is nice to <br /> think about a new building, but driving a used car, for the next few years, may be wiser than <br /> driving a new one. He said from the perspective of those who use the current building, it is not <br /> well laid out but the building itself is workable. He said he has never heard complaints from <br /> the staff that work there. <br /> Commissioner Rich asked if the turn around issues in the parking lot will be addressed, <br /> should the plan to renovate the existing site move forward. <br /> Kristin Hess said the majority of the money will be spent on the building, and as little as <br /> possible on the outer site. She said the lot may be re-surfaced. <br /> Jeff Thompson said the lot does need to be re-surfaced. <br /> Kristin Hess said some of the utilities need to be upgraded, and sprinklers will need to <br /> be added to the building. She said there is too much impervious surface on this site. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos asked if daylighting baffles could be brought in on the roof, <br /> as well as varying the ceiling height. <br /> Kristin Hess said this is a good strategy, but it is more expensive to do this, and would <br /> increase the current cost estimates. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos said it would be worth the investment as employees have <br /> better work product when there is daylight. <br /> Commissioner Jacobs said whenever the Board votes, he hopes it leaves room for <br /> recommendations that were proposed by the citizen group in the early 2000s. <br /> Chair Dorosin said the affordable housing potential for this building should not be <br /> underestimated, and he would be inclined to look at another site for the EAC. He said this site <br /> is probably the best County owned parcel of land for affordable housing. He suggested <br /> adding affordable housing as a second story to the renovated EAC. <br /> Chair Dorosin said if the Board moves towards the renovations, he would ask that time <br /> be taken to look at other points offered up by Commissioner Price and Commissioner Jacobs. <br /> Commissioner Price said that is why she suggested renovating at this point, and then <br /> look at other sites down the line. <br /> Chair Dorosin said he would rather not spend money on the current site, with the intent <br /> to abandon it. He would rather take three months looking for an alternate site, and if nothing is <br /> found, then proceed with the renovation. <br /> Commissioner Marcoplos asked if it makes sense to defer this decision in order to find <br /> out more affordable housing possibilities. He said there is information still needed from the <br /> original work group recommendations, affordable housing possibilities, as well as any potential <br /> EAC sites on highway 70. <br /> Bonnie Hammersley said the request is for the Board to share its preferred option or <br /> options. She said staff wanted to have this discussion in order to receive further direction, and <br /> the Board does not have to make any decisions at this point. She said staff will follow up on <br /> Commissioner Jacobs' requests - more uses for the current site, and other options on the 70 <br /> corridor. <br /> Chair Dorosin said staff will look at recommendations from original study group; <br /> affordable housing calculations, including possible multi-use on the current site; and look at <br /> other parcels on highway 70 corridor. <br /> A motion was made by Commissioner McKee, seconded by Commissioner Price to <br /> endorse option 1 as the preferred option, pending the review of the original work committee's <br />