Browse
Search
Agenda - 05-23-1983
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Agenda - 05-23-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2017 3:04:09 PM
Creation date
4/18/2017 2:34:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
5/23/1983
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19830523
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
175
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
qlJ <br /> 7 <br /> addressed and expressed concern with the impact on the value of the adjacent <br /> lands. <br /> Roger Smith asked if the Horace Williams problem justifies removal of the <br /> conditions placed on the Midway Airport Special Use Permit and answered his own <br /> question with a negative cespuose. <br /> John Worthen, Attorney, indicated that the developer would provide <br /> information on the proposed accessory uses and the possible fire access through <br /> Meadowcrest. <br /> Commissioner Ritted indicated that the additional information and evidence <br /> would be received at a continuation of the public hearing at a later date. <br /> Pat Crawford, Bingham Township resident, asked if the additional evidence <br /> would be available for public cnmment, <br /> Commissioner Whitted doswezed affirmatively and indicated that the <br /> continuation of the public hearing would be on June 27, 1983, <br /> Commissioner Lloyd moved, seconded by Commissioner Whitted to approve <br /> continuation of the public hearing to June 27, 1983. <br /> o-a Imaimsed Private Road Standards <br /> Ricky Cannity made the presentation. (see pages of this book) <br /> There were no citizen comments. <br /> D-3 21zoppxa-Text Cbwageo tm-lbx_autuIimiajan Regulations <br /> Ricky Cannity made the presentation. (see pages nf this book) <br /> There were no citizen comments. <br /> D-4 Ezuzpoosau]_atX±_gbaoges to the Zoning Ordinance <br /> Ricky Cannity made the presentation. (see pages _ _ of this book) <br /> Planning Board Member Kizer asked if this allowed the possibility of a <br /> modification to the Special Use Permit without being subject to a public <br /> hearing if passed. Member Kizer felt that the hearing should be continued to <br /> obtain public input on these changes. <br /> There were no citizen comments. <br /> o-1 map DECISIONS - Farmland nrasaersaztioa�bzz�zxuo <br /> Logan Irvin, Planning Board Chair, indicated that the Planning Board <br /> endorsed the program. He added that the sentence regarding 1-40 should be <br /> deleted in #4 of the findings of faot. <br /> Commissioner Marshall moved, seconded by Commissioner Willhoit to contract <br /> for legislative drafting of the program into a form for legislative submittal. <br /> VOTE: Ayes, 3; Noes, 2 (Commissioners Lloyd and Walker) . <br /> Commissioner Lloyd indicated that he had two areas of concern with the <br /> program: the required sign-up for a ten or a twenty year conservation <br /> agreement and the requirement regarding application of SCS approved erosion <br /> control practices on critical areas. He noted that he would oppose a program <br /> containing these items. <br /> E-2 Watersbed_Frntertioo Measures <br /> Rick Cannity gave the presention on the implementation of watershed <br /> protection measures. <br /> Irvin Logan requested that the Board reconsider the minimum lot sizes and <br /> direct the Planning Board appropriately as the Planning Board felt that this <br /> issue was critical to their consideration of industrial development. He noted <br /> that there was quite a variation in opinion on minimum lot size in water supply <br /> watersheds among Planning Board Members. <br /> Commissioner Willhoit indicated that there was considerable misinformation <br /> regarding the application of minimum lot sizes in the County, noting that many <br /> erroneously thought or were led to believe that the minimum lot sizes would be <br /> A..i.. ~na .",~,c^~ac PP ""r~* <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.