Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
U4b <br /> - • <br /> 7 <br /> * North Carol ma Dog Law Manual, UNC, Institute of Government, 1978. <br /> * Supplement to N.C. Dog Law Manual, UNC, Institute of Government, 1981 . <br /> 1. Addis & Arnold, The Lower Animals (1884) . For law <br /> review treatment of this topic, see The Catholic Dictionary 1. 384. <br /> See laLso Friend, Animal Cruel Laws: The Case for Reform, <br /> 8 UI Rich. L. Rev. 201 (114) .- <br /> 2. E. Leavitt, Animals and Their Legal Rights (2d ed. 1370) <br /> 3. 1881, c. 34, s.1; c. 368, ss. 1, 15. <br /> 4. State v. Dickens, 215 N.C. 303. 305, 1 S.E.2d 837, <br /> 838 (1939) • <br /> 5. Id. <br /> 6. See pages 4-5. <br /> 7. State v. Neal, 120 N.C. 613, 27 S .E. 81 (1897) . <br /> 8. While killing a dog in similar circumstances would <br /> be lawful, the court found that killing the chickens was unjustified <br /> because the chickens, unlike a dog, could have easily been <br /> impounded rather than killed. <br /> 9. State v. Neal, 120 N.C. 613, 620, 27 S.E. 81, 84 (1897) . <br /> 10. State v. Fowler, 22 N.C. App. 144, 205 S.E.2d 749 <br /> (1974) . <br /> 11. N.C. GEN. STAT. ch. 19A. <br /> 12. Id. S 14-362. <br /> 13. S 2156(a) . <br /> 14. Id. at 5 2156(b) . <br /> 15. Id. at S 2156(c), (g) (3) . <br /> 25, Mugford v. Baltimore, 185 MD. 266, 44 A.2d 745 (1945), <br /> Unionville v. Martin, 95 Mo. App. 28, 68 S.W. 605 (1902); <br /> C. S Rhyne, Municipal Law 5 4-10 (1887) <br /> 28. N.C. GEN. STAT. -5--67-30, <br />