Browse
Search
Agenda - 04-18-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2010's
>
2017
>
Agenda - 04-18-2017 - Regular Mtg.
>
Agenda - 04-18-2017 - 8-a - Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/18/2017 7:27:45 AM
Creation date
4/18/2017 7:25:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
4/18/2017
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
8a
Document Relationships
Minutes 04-18-2017
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2010's\2017
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
19 <br /> 1 Commissioner McKee referred to the state funding contribution on $238 million plus, <br /> 2 and asked if this represents the 10% of the project of which has been spoken previously. <br /> 3 Ted Cole said that is the 10% of the $2.38 billion of the project. <br /> 4 Commissioner McKee said if it scored a little over 8, why is the abstract number of "10" <br /> 5 being used. <br /> 6 Ted Cole said he will get that answer for him. <br /> 7 Commissioner McKee said he is concerned, as a project cost of $2.388 billion is being <br /> 8 shown, but the true cost is $3.3 billion. He asked if there is a reason why the true cost is not <br /> 9 being shown, since that is what will have to be paid. <br /> 10 Ted Cole said both numbers are correct, and show the upfront costs versus the cost of <br /> 11 what must be borrowed to build. <br /> 12 Commissioner McKee asked if $2.388 billion is shown in the Federal Transportation <br /> 13 Administration (FTA) application, and if this is the maximum amount of which the federal <br /> 14 government will pay 50%. <br /> 15 Ted Cole said yes. <br /> 16 Commissioner McKee said that would leave everything over $2.388 billion to be borne <br /> 17 by Orange and Durham Counties, which jacks the percentage that Durham County and Orange <br /> 18 County will have to pay from 40% to at least 52%. He said going with the 52% estimate, <br /> 19 Orange County would pay $394 million. <br /> 20 Ted Cole said yes, when the interest expense is pulled into the numbers. <br /> 21 Commissioner McKee said that does not include the state of good repair borrowing. <br /> 22 Ted Cole said yes. <br /> 23 Mitch Brigulio, from Davenport, said the numbers are moving around a little bit, but what <br /> 24 is included in the Transit Plan and the FTA document is around $2.46 million range. He said <br /> 25 the difference between the $2.388 million and $2.46 million is the financing costs that are <br /> 26 eligible to be reimbursed by FTA. He said that is the financing cost during the construction <br /> 27 period. <br /> 28 Mindy Taylor, GoTriangle Senior Financial Analyst, said FTA wants to see not only the <br /> 29 capital costs of the project, but the portion of financing costs that are eligible for federal <br /> 30 reimbursement. <br /> 31 Commissioner McKee asked if the financing cost, covered by FTA, only goes out to <br /> 32 2032 or 2035. <br /> 33 Mindy Taylor said it is until 2032, which is the amount of time it takes to disperse the <br /> 34 federal funding share. <br /> 35 Commissioner McKee asked if the Counties incur every dollar thereafter. <br /> 36 Mindy Taylor said yes. <br /> 37 Commissioner Jacobs said every time the costs are mentioned, the cost to which the <br /> 38 speaker is referring should also be mentioned. He said a lot of people see that the project <br /> 39 costs have jumped, and he said this is because GoTriangle went from present dollars to year of <br /> 40 expenditure dollars, and this should also be restated with frequency; all in the effort for <br /> 41 transparency. <br /> 42 Commissioner Price referred to the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation <br /> 43 Act (TIFIA) debt funding, and asked if there is limit to the amount for which the project would be <br /> 44 eligible. She said her concern is that the state funding is not guaranteed, and wonders what will <br /> 45 happen if more funds need to be borrowed. She referred to the New Starts grant, and heard <br /> 46 that these will only be available for projects that are shovel ready within 90 days. <br /> 47 Mitch Brigulio said TIFIA funding has to be applied for through the federal government, <br /> 48 and there is no set cap to what can be applied for, but the loan will be awarded based upon the <br /> 49 application and what the government feels is the right number to award. He said part of this is <br /> 50 driven by what the revenues and expenditures are and what can be paid back. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.