Orange County NC Website
15 <br /> 1 • Three seats on the Board are filled, with staggered four-year terms, by individuals <br /> 2 residing in District 1 and nominated by the voters in District 1 during the primary <br /> 3 election. <br /> 4 These district-nominated candidates are then elected by all the voters in the entire <br /> 5 County during the general election. <br /> 6 • Two seats on the Board are filled, with staggered four-year terms, by individuals residing <br /> 7 in District 2 and nominated by the voters in District 2 during the primary election. These <br /> 8 district-nominated candidates are then elected by all the voters in the entire County <br /> 9 during the general election. <br /> 10 • The other two other seats on the Board are filled, with staggered four-year terms, by <br /> 11 individuals residing anywhere in the County and nominated by all voters in the County <br /> 12 during the primary election. These "at large" candidates are then elected by all the <br /> 13 voters in the entire County during the general election. <br /> 14 <br /> 15 In summary, five district seats on the Board are filled based on district residency and district <br /> 16 nomination during the primary election, followed by countywide election in the general election. <br /> 17 The two at large seats are filled based on countywide nomination and countywide election. <br /> 18 <br /> 19 REVIEW OF DISTRICT ELECTIONS MAP BASED ON 2010 CENSUS <br /> 20 Final numbers for the 2010 Census were published in 2011 providing new population numbers <br /> 21 for Orange County as a whole as well as for the two current electoral districts. North Carolina <br /> 22 General Statute 153A-22 states, "If a county is divided into electoral districts for the purpose of <br /> 23 nominating or electing persons to the board of commissioners, the board of commissioners may <br /> 24 find as a fact whether there is substantial inequality of population among the districts." <br /> 25 Population growth or decline in districts can lead to significant deviations in the numbers of <br /> 26 residents between districts, thereby compromising the integrity of the districts and the election <br /> 27 plan as a whole. Therefore the Board may, but is not required to, review the impact of the new <br /> 28 Census numbers to determine if there is substantial inequality. <br /> 29 <br /> 30 Attachment C is a map showing the current electoral districts along with the population <br /> 31 numbers based on the 2010 census. In the 2006 adopted plan (Attachments A and B), Orange <br /> 32 County met its goal of keeping the population deviations within five percent of the exact <br /> 33 population totals for each district, less than a total of ten percent deviation (referred to nationally <br /> 34 as the Ten Percent Rule). Attachment C shows that Districts 1 and 2 were still within the Ten <br /> 35 Percent Rule deviation criteria based on the 2010 Census data. Since the Districts were, <br /> 36 combined, within the ten percent deviation allowed by law, there can be no finding of substantial <br /> 37 inequality. <br /> 38 <br /> 39 Attachment D is the resolution adopted by the Board on June 2011 acknowledging there is no <br /> 40 substantial inequality revealed by the 2010 census results. <br /> 41 In recent months members of the Board of Commissioners have expressed an interest in <br /> 42 discussing and possibly amending the current election method for seats on the Board of <br /> 43 Commissioners. Several related issues have been voiced regarding potentially amending the <br /> 44 method. Staff has addressed some of those topics below. <br /> 45 <br /> 46 If the Board chose to move forward with proposing an amendment to the current <br /> 47 election method, when could voter referendum occur? <br /> 48 • The North Carolina General Statutes require that counties schedule special voter <br /> 49 referenda only in even years when all the voting precincts in the County will be open. <br />