Orange County NC Website
• <br /> ORANGE COUNTY <br /> �t i DDAPD OF COMMISSIONERS Asti erg Agenda <br /> Ac:iION AGENDA ITJDi ABSTRACT Item No.D^'LA <br /> PANG DATE January 18, 1983 <br /> Subject: Complaints as to Wild and Vicious Animals <br /> Department: Hee t : County 'anager 1 Public Heaxing: yes • no <br /> At. - t(s : p Information Contact: <br /> Health Director - 732-8181 ext. 311 <br /> Yes County Manager - 732-8181 ext. 501 <br /> Phone Number: <br /> PURPOSE: To consider whether to regulate or ban the keeping of such animals in the <br /> county. <br /> NEED: Various citizens have raised concerns over wild non-domestic, or vicious <br /> domestic animals being harbored in the County. The concern is that they <br /> are dangerous to persons or property or have the potential of being <br /> dangerous to persons or property. <br /> Looking just to the recent past, several incidents can be noted. In <br /> October complaints were reported over the escape of a bear from a kennel , <br /> located near Chapel Hill. In December, the Health Denartment investigated <br /> an incident where a pit bull dog had escaped the owners property near • <br /> Hillsborough and attacked an 18 month old boy inflicting life-threatening <br /> injury. In January a boa constrictor escaped its owner in an apartment <br /> complex in Chapel Hill . All of these incidents point out insufficient <br /> attention by the owners as to what is necessary for security of confine- <br /> ment and proper care. <br /> The question is whether Board action is necessary to insure health, safety <br /> and welfare measures for the public's protection. Present local laws <br /> (zoning ordinance, animal control ordinance) do not address these types of <br /> animals. The State Uildlife Commission rules only apply to animals which <br /> are indigenous to the area. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's regulation <br /> apply only to persons interested in securing licenses as a dealer or <br /> exhibitor of exotic animals. They do not apply to people who might contend <br /> the animals are being kept as personal pets. In regard to kennels, USDA <br /> only inspects once a year. It's response time would be slow in dealing <br /> with animal escapes or allegations of inhumane treatment. <br /> If Board action is deemed necessary the General Statutes of North Carolina <br /> authorize boards of county commissioners to take action. Section 153A-121 <br /> permits counties "to define, regulate, prohibit, or abate acts, omissions , <br /> or conditions detrimental to the 4lealth, safety or welfare of its citizens <br /> and the peace and dignity of the county". Section 153A-131 permits counties <br /> to regulate, restrict or prohibit the possession or harboring of animals <br /> which are dangerous to persons or property. <br /> Two approaches are attached as exhibits. The Chatham County proposed <br /> ordinance describes a regulatory approach whereas one in effect in Nilson <br /> County exemplifies a prohibition approach. <br /> RECOMMENDATION: <br /> As the Board decides. <br />