Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-04-1983
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Agenda - 01-04-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2017 8:42:17 AM
Creation date
4/12/2017 8:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/4/1983
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19830104
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAB'" <br /> Gordon noted that a principal amendment could only be <br /> considered once a year <br /> Luce indicated that at the time the. policy was adopted the <br /> Piedmont Power proposal was already being processed. <br /> Crawford asked Luce why this proposal could not be con- <br /> sidered for a"Class A" Special Use Permit: public utility <br /> station. <br /> Luce responded that the proposal included more than a sub- <br /> station facility. <br /> The Board discussed the consideration of Piedmont Power <br /> as a speical use. <br /> Irvin withdrew his second to the motion. <br /> Lunsford indicated she would vote against any motion that <br /> extended the node. <br /> The Board discussed revising the motion on the floor. <br /> Collins indicated any redesignation of the proposal would <br /> require re-advertisement of'the public hearing. <br /> Walters withdrew his motion. <br /> MOTION: Kizer moved that the Board recommend that the County <br /> Commissioners consider Piedmont's application under P-16 on page 4 <br /> 13 and grant them a "Class A" Special Use Permit to con- <br /> struct the project on 33.92acres with the notation that <br /> the Planning Board feels that since this is a more re- <br /> strictive classification than the P/t) application it need <br /> not necessarily be re-advertised. <br /> Gordon asked if the reference to advertisement could be <br /> deleted and left up to the County Attorney. <br /> Kizer revised the motion to delete all wording after <br /> classification. Irvin seconded. <br /> VOTE: 8 in favor <br /> Abstained - Wilson because of financial interest <br /> Irvin indicated the importance of the minutes sharing <br /> in detail the discussion which led to the decision. <br /> MOTION: Gordon moved that the Board deny the requested change to the <br /> Land Use Plan because it did not feel a modification <br /> is appropriate at this time. Lunsford seconded. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.