Agenda - 01-04-1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

DRAB'" Gordon noted that a principal amendment could only be considered once a year Luce indicated that at the time the. policy was adopted the Piedmont Power proposal was already being processed. Crawford asked Luce why this proposal could not be con- sidered for a"Class A" Special Use Permit: public utility station. Luce responded that the proposal included more than a sub- station facility. The Board discussed the consideration of Piedmont Power as a speical use. Irvin withdrew his second to the motion. Lunsford indicated she would vote against any motion that extended the node. The Board discussed revising the motion on the floor. Collins indicated any redesignation of the proposal would require re-advertisement of'the public hearing. Walters withdrew his motion. MOTION: Kizer moved that the Board recommend that the County Commissioners consider Piedmont's application under P-16 on page 4 13 and grant them a "Class A" Special Use Permit to con- struct the project on 33.92acres with the notation that the Planning Board feels that since this is a more re- strictive classification than the P/t) application it need not necessarily be re-advertised. Gordon asked if the reference to advertisement could be deleted and left up to the County Attorney. Kizer revised the motion to delete all wording after classification. Irvin seconded. VOTE: 8 in favor Abstained - Wilson because of financial interest Irvin indicated the importance of the minutes sharing in detail the discussion which led to the decision. MOTION: Gordon moved that the Board deny the requested change to the Land Use Plan because it did not feel a modification is appropriate at this time. Lunsford seconded.