Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-04-1983
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Agenda - 01-04-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2017 8:42:17 AM
Creation date
4/12/2017 8:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/4/1983
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19830104
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• <br /> DRAFT <br /> _ . <br /> Collins restated that there are difficulties in avoiding <br /> a reactive position in administering a Land Use Plan. <br /> Lansford asked if the node was defined by a stipulated <br /> center <br /> Collins responded that the center was the intersection. <br /> Gordon cited that the node concept is intended to cluster <br /> development and avoid strip development.. <br /> Shanklin inquired if a second node could be created. He <br /> added that he did not think extending the node was an <br /> appropriate means of accomodating Piedmont Power to make- <br /> it acceptable to the Land Use Plan. <br /> Collins disagreed stressing the definition of a node accord- <br /> ing to the Land Use Plan focused on the "intersection <br /> of arterial and collector roads. <br /> Shanklin responded that the application of the node concept <br /> was impractical. <br /> Kizer stated that if there were "teeth" in the enforcement <br /> of the concept the desired clustering would likely result... <br /> The Board discussed. the enforcement of the node concept. <br /> Walters moved that the Board approve the request by Piedmont <br /> Power now and continue discussions on changes to the Land <br /> Use Plan to address the issues of concerns expressed.. <br /> Irvin stated there needed to an interim of flexible decisions <br /> until a more rigorous plan is developed as the Board agreed <br /> to do a few months ago. <br /> Crawford asked what kind of amendment the Piedmont proposal <br /> was. <br /> Irvin seconded the motion. <br /> Irvin emphasized he did not like 'shuffling of the rode <br /> boundaries nor the circular concept. Se added the node <br /> should be planned. <br /> Cordon noted this was a principal amendment. <br /> Kizer asked if Piedmont was a public utility adding that <br /> if it was it may be considered. for a "Class-.A" Special' Use <br /> Permit as permitted in this area and classified as a public <br /> utility station. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.