Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
f ' ' <br /> N <br /> 1. 2 <br /> 2. <br /> 3. ' <br /> (y. Mrs. James Rippy, an adjacent property owner, asked the difference between <br /> R-4 and 11-3 zones. t1r. Cannily responded to her satisfaction. <br /> 6. C. 3. PROPOSED ZONING TEXT AMENDF1NTS <br /> . Mt. Cannity made the presentation on the proposed zoning text amendments to <br /> 8. the Boards. (Mr. Cannity's verbatim remarkes are on pages of this book.) <br /> 9. Following his presentation on the proposed changes, Me. Cannity responded to <br /> j74« questions from the Boards and members of the audience, clarifying the Changes as <br /> 1 <br /> 1. and if necessary, <br /> 12. C. 4. AMENDMENT TO TEE LAND USE PLAN—PIEDMONT POWER COMPANY <br /> Ms. Susan Smith, of the Planning Staff, made the presentation to the Boards <br /> 14. on the proposed amendment to the Land Use Plan for Piedmont Pdwer Company. She <br /> • sited the location on NC 86 and said the request is reasonable given the proposed <br /> use and it is not incompatible with existing development. <br /> 317. Mr, Delmas Adams, representing Piedmont Power's architectural firm, said <br /> 11396 the site had been purchased in 1974 and it had been Piedmont's intention to locate <br /> • its facility on that site. <br /> Ms. Bezel Lunsford, speaking as a private citizen, spoke in opposition to <br /> 2 • the- proposed changes; she cited the changing character of the area from its present <br /> 2 . rural character. She said her opposition was dot directed at the company. <br /> 20. Mr. J. T. Squires from Fayetteville spoke for Mr. and Mrs. Millis who own <br /> property along NC 86. He wanted to know what the effect of the proposed use <br /> 26. would be on Mr. and Mrs. Millis' property. He asked if the buffer zone is <br /> 2 . entirely on Piedmont's property. Kr. Cannily replied yes. <br /> { <br /> Mr. Cannity, responding to Commissioner Wilihoit, said Piedmont had acquired <br /> 2 . the property in 1974 and even if Piedmont's plans had been known chat knowledge <br /> 29 would not have affected the designation given the site during the zoning process. <br /> 30. Commissioner Wilihoit asked if money had been expended for planning on the <br /> 31 . site at the time zoning was adopted. <br /> • 32. <br /> Mr. Adams replied that he did not know wham zoning was implemented in Orange <br /> 33. County, however, following the .purchase his firm had been commissioned to do the <br /> 3#� site study. He added that the "final map" indicated that the site was to be used <br /> • <br /> 3S. for office purposes, "storage yard and related power company facilities." <br /> Ms. Smith, responding to Ms. Crawford said that the plat recorded showed <br /> • <br />