Browse
Search
Agenda - 01-04-1983
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1983
>
Agenda - 01-04-1983
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2017 8:42:17 AM
Creation date
4/12/2017 8:12:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
1/4/1983
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19830104
(Linked From)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,r7 COMPANY, INC. <br /> THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPAN , <br /> CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br /> 100 HAYES BUILDING, GLEN LENNOX CENTER,CHAPEL HILL <br /> P 0 BOX 2896,CHAPEL HILL. NORTH CAROLINA 27514 (919)967.7079 <br /> December 21, 1982 <br /> Mr. Albert Kittrel ., Director <br /> Orange County Community Development <br /> 106 East Margaret !Lane <br /> Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 <br /> RE: Northern Fairview C.D. Street Improvements <br /> OCO 8001 <br /> Dear Mr. Kittrell:l <br /> This letter is written at your request to explain the unforeseen expense of <br /> $5,271.85 for the relocation of several Duke Power Company power poles in the <br /> Northern Fairview area <br /> Several of the str,eets where improvements are being made are being widened, and <br /> the widening necessitates in some cases that certain power poles be relocated <br /> farther from the centerline of the road. In all of our past experience, when <br /> power poles needed to be relocated in association with improvements to a road <br /> on the NC DOT system (as these roads are) , the relocation was carried out at the <br /> expense of the power company. The reason the power company would bear the <br /> expense is that tle power company `encroached" on the DOT right-of-way in making <br /> the initial power ine installation, and the standard conditions of a DOT encroach- <br /> ment agreement are that the utility owner must relocate the utilities if they <br /> interfere with a future road improvement. <br /> The situation at llortherh'Fairview is different. In the area where the power <br /> poles are to be relocated, which is along the southern part of Old Cedar Grove <br /> Road, DOT acquires the 60-foot right-of-way there in March of 1972, and the power <br /> poles were already existing at that time, Although additional right-of-way was <br /> acquired in 1972 l,y DOT, and this additional right-of-way included the land on <br /> which the power poles stand, there was no way to impose on Duke Power a condition <br /> they had not agreed to at the time of initial installation. Thus, if the power <br /> poles are to be relocated, Duke Power must be paid to do so. <br /> We regret that weldid not foresee DOT's inability to require Duke Power to relocate <br /> the power poles a Duke Power's cost. On discovering the problem, we have worked <br /> with DOT and Duke Power to reduce the number of poles to be relocated by more than <br /> half (and reduce the cost from an original quote of $19,000) . We now believe that <br /> certain poles must be relocated in order to construct the streets properly, and we <br /> believe that the $5,271.85 is a necessary cost of the project, <br /> Sincerely, <br /> THE JOHN . ADAMS COMPANY, INC. <br /> BY: klirk,44014.e. <br /> JO R. McAD S, P.S. <br /> Pr si,dent <br /> JRMc:ow <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.