Orange County NC Website
1 [i!ii!! 002 1-� THE JOHN R. McADAMS COMPANY, INC. <br /> CONSULTING ENGINEERS <br /> 100 HAYES BUILDING,GLEN LENNOX CENTER,CHAPEL HILL <br /> P . BOX 2896.CHAPEL HILL, NORTH CAROLINA 27514 L�} . (919)9677079 <br /> December 21, 1982 <br /> Mr. Albert Kittrel1, Director <br /> Orange County Community Development <br /> 106 East Margaret Lane <br /> Hillsborough, North Carolina 27278 <br /> RE: Northern Fairview C.D. Street Improvements <br /> OCO 8001 1 <br /> Dear Mr. Kittrell : <br /> This letter is written at your request to explain the unforeseen expense of <br /> 55,271,85 for the relocation of several Duke Power Company power poles in the <br /> Northern Fairview area. <br /> Several of the streets where improvements are being made are being widened, and <br /> the widening necessitates in some cases that certain power poles be relocated <br /> farther from thelcenterline of the road. In all of our past experience, when <br /> power poles needed to be relocated in association with improvements to a road <br /> on the NC DOT sy9tem (as these roads are) , the relocation was carried out at the <br /> expense of the power company. The reason the power company would bear the <br /> expense is that -Ihe power company "encroached" on the DOT right-of-way in making <br /> the initial powerline installation; and the standard conditions of a DOT encroach- <br /> ment agreement arse that the utility owner must relocate the utilities if they <br /> interfere with aIfuture road improvement. <br /> The situation at1Northern Fairview is different. In the area where the power <br /> poles are to be relocated, which is along the southern part of Old Cedar Grove <br /> Road, DOT acquir d the 60-foot right-of-way there in March of 1972, and the power <br /> poles were alrea y existing at that time. Although additional right-of-way was <br /> acquired in 1972 by DOT, and this additional right-of-way included the land on <br /> which the power L�Oles stand, there was no way to impose on Duke Power a condition <br /> they had not agr rd to at the time of initial installation. Thus, if the power <br /> poles are to be relocated, Duke Power must be paid to do so. <br /> We regret that we did not foresee DOT's inability to require Duke Power to relocate <br /> the power poles at Duke Power's cost. On discovering the problem, we have worked <br /> with DOT and Duke Power to reduce the number of poles to be relocated by more than <br /> half (and reduce the cost from an original quote of $19,000) . We now believe that <br /> certain poles must be relocated in order to construct the streets properly, and we <br /> believe that the $5,271.85 is a necessary cost of the project. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> THE JOHN . ADAMS COMPANY, INC. <br /> BY: Rfi://C &64"YV <br /> JO R. McADAMS, P.E. <br /> Pr sident <br /> JRMc:cw <br />