Agenda - 02-15-1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

• Deletion of the 50% limitation on f1 i ght training may increase the number of "touch and go" Fessesmade to practice landing manueve.rs. An increase in noise would occur and create a nuisance problem. Uses permitted at the airport under the special use permit were those identi- fied and requested by the developer in the project narrative and those shown an the site plan. An alteration of the allowable uses would probably require another public hearing too formally amend the approved permit. Deletion of the access road regtaxt would result in increased response time for fire protection purposes. The necessity of such access, however, was greater for protection of the initial airport proposal; i.e. an airpark, inclir ing the airport as well as offices and warehouses. The County Attorney will provide information relative to whether another public hearing will be required on all or some of the requested modifications. It has been the County's policy not to take a direct interest in the develop- ment of airport far5litaes, either through specific regulations such as air- port hazard zoning, or through construction of a public facility. It has assumed the role of "permitting authcFrity", establishing through the special use permit procedure neressary safeguards to secure the public health, safety and. welfare. For this reason, condition #2 should stand, making it ant upon the appli- cant to secure necessary easenents for control of the approach-departure zone. Condition 07 should stand as well, pending development of the airport and the establishment of records as to demand for flight training. If the demand does not exceed the established limit, there is no need for modification of the condition. Condition 03 should, stand, pending the submission of a list of specific uses desired at the airport feri lity. These uses should be noted as well on the site plan. Condition #4 should stand, pending a re-evaluation of the access problem by fire/rescue personnel. As noted previously, any changes are subject to the County Attorney's opinion regarding the need for another public hearing.