Agenda - 03-28-1983 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

'` � x;'44 r ti r ' r _ r r-rv} Rq ; � 1r n t °'i VVV ..r Rµt _ •1 `.. .T•i •. -y. ..r ice..•Yf ..•... . ..+J.y C . Mr. Richard IWhitted Page 2 . At the present time, we own or control sufficient land to provide an Japproach-departure zone of between 1,000 and 1,500 feet on either end of the runway, but no more. We ask the County Commi$Siones to reduce the requirements set forth in Condition 2 to cover an approach-depattua-e zone of 1,000 feet from each end of the runway, or n- the alternative no more than 1,500 from either end of the runway. At a distance of 1,500 feet from the runway, objects could be no r . higher than 75 feet, and we believe this would be sUbstantia.31 compliance with the intent of the ordinance to provide adequate safety measures for the use of the airport. As the airport is being built in a residential and agricultural zone, we do not envision tliat any structures will be built to a height greater than 75 feet, and would therefore pose no problem to incoming aircraft beyond the 1,500 foot distance. . 3. We believe that the third condition, restricting commercial uses only to those uses specifically referenced in the project narrative and the.site plan, is unduly restrictive and would greatly hamper the operation of the airport. For example, the condition Would appear to prohibit any typ e of normal accessory commercialluse, such as snack bar-or restaurant, gift shop, office . for sale of aircraft, and other normal and incidental activities associdtedhwith airport facilities. We believe this condition can be made more flexible, and generally be within the intent of the zoning ordinance dealing with accessory uses normally associated with such ,rojects. 4. The fourth condition contains many safety features which . are acceptable to the developer, but some are outside our ability to obtain. The condition requires us to provide an access road from the projec1t to Teer Road, but the developer does not have, nor is there any indication that we can obtain, a right-of-way across the adjacent property located between the project and Teer Road. l ,. believe the fire chief indicated in his letter that such an access road wool be desirable, but would not be essential for the provision of adequate fire protection services. access road to Therefore we Road be . that this condition of requiring the be delete from Condition 4. 5. I The construction schedule set forth in Condition 5 appears to be adequate and reasonable. . 6. The requitement of a bond for the public improvements set