Browse
Search
Agenda - 02-21-2006-10b
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
2000's
>
2006
>
Agenda - 02-21-2006
>
Agenda - 02-21-2006-10b
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2008 8:48:33 AM
Creation date
8/29/2008 9:06:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
2/21/2006
Document Type
Agenda
Agenda Item
10b
Document Relationships
Minutes - 20060221
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\2000's\2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I Paul Thames - Re' Orange County - Buckhorn Project Page 2 <br />Design Management Unit <br />Construction Grants & Loans Section <br />Paul Thames wrote: <br />Cecil, <br />I am copying (attaching) you a letter that I sent to Bobby Blowe on <br />Friday, seeking clarification on issues that touch on your review as <br />well as the overall picture for this project. Perhaps Bobby has shared <br />this and his response(s) with you already. Bobby's responses did not <br />fully confirm all of those issues I was trying to nail down, instead <br />generally referencing the ongoing dialogue with you and Seth on behalf <br />of CGLS, Jim Thames and myself on the part of Orange County and Robert <br />Wilson and Darrell Russell behalf of Mebane. <br />I would appreciate it if you would look at the attached letter, <br />particularly the portions (page 2) related to your review -specifically <br />what you are expecting to receive from Mebane and Orange County in terms <br />of documentation and when you will be authorizing Orange County to <br />proceed with the portion of the project not involving the actual <br />construction work that improves the capacity of Mebane's infrastructure. <br />I also want to point out that Mebane - at least according to my last <br />conversation with Mebane -now proposes to replace the existing 120D If <br />of 8" gravity line with 12" line as opposed to extending the 8" force <br />main to the existing end of the 12" gravity line. <br />In any event, please review the letter and advise as soon as possible <br />if my understanding as to what is required and the sequence of events is <br />or is not accurate. Thank you for you assistance. <br />Paul <br />Paul K Thames, PE <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.