Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
872 <br /> .~ ' - <br /> , <br /> 189��- <br /> MEMORANDUM <br /> TO: Board Members <br /> FROM: County Manager <br /> DATE: October 6, 1982 <br /> RE: Section B Existing and Moderate Rehabilitation Programs <br /> The County is nearing a point at which decisions will need to be <br /> made on the Section 8 Existing and Moderate Rehabilitation Programs, xhjch <br /> maseu»se �s due to HUD by the end of October on the Nanagemenzexev`ewog <br /> response / l and administrative problems in the way programs were being on <br /> found fiscal Chapel Hill Housing Authority, The County must sign o if <br /> handledwbys teo Aapenr�ty has developed nr substjtutotitstowntanswersuusjng <br /> �«� =" �' the Authority Moreover, County contract with the .. <br /> these are found unsatisfactory, ` contract changes. Since <br /> Authority calls for a 60 day notification of anyc»nr would need to be <br /> the new program year begins January l , such notification = <br /> made by November l. <br /> Uriginally, the response date was set at August 6. Delays were <br /> granted by HUD in order to allow the Authority more time to formulate its <br /> t <br /> plan for deficit reductions and to clarify the exac t amount in deficit. <br /> ------- <br /> What follows will be the listing of problems.rnblems' The first two were raised <br /> by the Management Review. The remainder directly problems found in researching <br /> related to the Review they <br /> the history of the programs; though not irecz/y re` <br /> too should be dealt with in deciding the scope o f corrective action. <br /> l Administrative and operational expenseshave exceeded nthe famount <br /> ' for these purposes thereby creating deficit. <br /> HUD has granted <br /> 2 Procedural errors were cited in 11 areas. <br /> 2. <br /> J The auditing cycle for the two progr ams is not in conformance <br /> The State <br /> 3. with requirements (G.S. Chapter l5Q) of the State.a e' 2 <br /> lls for an annual audit whereas practice has been every <br /> «a come It has been only recently that all housing authorities <br /> years` under the annual requirement and that due to the <br /> have li <br /> General's ruling. <br /> _ <br /> 4. Since 1978 there has been no contract between the County and <br /> ' the Chapel Hill Housing Authority for the Authority's admini- <br /> stration of the program. <br /> 5. The County has not monitored nor enforced requirements of the <br /> ' administrative plan which was Exhibit A of the contract, <br />