Browse
Search
Agenda - 11-22-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 11-22-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2017 8:38:02 AM
Creation date
4/4/2017 2:32:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
11/22/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19821122
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br /> ORANGE COU:NT <br /> BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS <br /> Action Agenda <br /> Item No.-b--5 <br /> ACTION AGENDA ITEM ABSTRACT <br /> MEETLNG DATE November 22. 1987 <br /> Subject: 1982 HUD MANAGEMENT REVIEW <br /> 1 Deeertrent: _COUNTY MANAGER I Pnblic Hsaring: yes n no <br /> [ Attackanent(s): <br /> Iriformation COntect:g. R. Thompson <br /> Yes--3 <br /> Phone Number:. 732-8181 ext. 502 <br /> .- <br /> PURPOSE: To consider authorizing response to the June 22, 1982 HUD Management Review <br /> and to notify Chapel Hill Housing Authority on any future contractUral <br /> arrangements for administration of the Section 8 programs through the <br /> Chapel Hill Rousing Authority. <br /> NEED: As prime Isponsor of the Section 8 Existing and Moderate Rehabilitation <br /> Programs he County received the findings of the Review in order to <br /> render a response by August 6, 1982. Time has been extended by HUD to <br /> the end of November in order to allow the Housing Authority, which <br /> administeTa the program through subcontract, to formulate a deficit <br /> reduction proposal, resolve programmatic findings and get these approved <br /> by the CoUnty prior to submission to HUD. In the interim the latter were <br /> resolved leaving only the issue of deficit reduction to be addressed. <br /> Answer to this question will depend on the option selected. The Board <br /> needs to consider options (outlined in attached October 6 memo) together <br /> with the advantages and disadvantages which apply. <br /> Sugject to the Board decision as to future administration of the program <br /> and action needed to be taken on the subcontract. If the Board wishes <br /> to continue the relation with the Housing Authority it needs to renew <br /> the expired contract. If the Board wishes the County to assume the program <br /> it needs to give the Housing Authority notice prior to assumption on <br /> January 1,1 1983, <br /> i <br /> See attached letter and report from Housing Authority dated November <br /> 12, 1982. I <br /> IMPACT: HUD's Washli.ngton Office has (since the Board's October 25, 1982, meeting) <br /> granted a S10,453.83 credit for exception rents approved from 1977-1979. <br /> This reduces the deficit from $27,595 to $17,141.17, <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> Other impacts are referenced in the October 6 memorandum. <br /> 1 <br /> I <br /> i <br /> RECOMMENDATIONS: As he Board decides on: <br /> 1. 'Response to the Management Review; and, <br /> 2. !Further contractings or County administration. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.