Orange County NC Website
- ' • <br /> " <br /> tea <br /> Shanklin suggested alternatives to the location of the reservoir on Corporation <br /> Lake includirurplacing the dam closer to the head waters as well as using a n <br /> herofdams on the stream branches feeding the Eno Fiver rather than a single <br /> Shanklin also Suggested that the Transition area be extended further north to <br /> acbcnodate developnent in that area. <br /> Lindsay Efland 'stressed that residents of Cheeks Tomishipwere familiar with <br /> satiqfied with 4 mixed developmElt pattern for Cheeks Township. <br /> Lindsay Efland mieed the followingmotims: <br /> MOTION 1: That the Cheeks Township AdyisoryCouncil aoprove <br /> the extension of the ten and twenty year transition <br /> areas as defined and presented by the Planning staff. <br /> No Oiccussion <br /> V6mZ: Unanimous <br /> MOTION 2: That industrial development be permitted anywhere within the I-85/US <br /> 70 4rridor and on either side of the corridor as defined by the <br /> transition area boundaries and extend as far east as the Cheeks/ <br /> pillsorough Township lines and notbelimited only to <br /> specific areas. <br /> Discussion followed on the activity node concept versus an open <br /> door concept of industrial/c=nexcial develop:eat. <br /> VOTE:.; Unanimous <br /> MOTION 3: That the Cheeks Township Advisory Council go on record, as supporting <br /> sager and water extensions into the transition areas for Cheeks <br /> Township: <br /> Lasculsion followed in which the TAC members indicated a desire to <br /> see this item included in the Land Use Plan. <br /> 1 <br /> VtYIE: Unanimous <br /> The Township Advisory Council ffEllbETS expressed concern that the available land <br /> for developmmt did not coincide with the land designated and proposed for develop- <br /> ment, stressing 16cal residents familiarity with the availability of land. <br /> Staff indicated that the Planning Board would consider the anendrrents and the TAC <br /> con-cents on Monday, September 20 and that a joint public hearing of the Planning <br /> Board and Board of County commissioners on the amendments was scheduled for <br /> September 27. <br /> The meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M. <br /> 1 <br /> I - <br />