Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-25-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 10-25-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2017 2:22:11 PM
Creation date
4/4/2017 2:00:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/25/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19821025
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
71
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
/ <br /> � <br /> | A0� <br /> "~J <br /> Some Board members felt that more flexibility was needed so that the County <br /> could negotiate with various companies; others felt that the question was not <br /> yu much cnmpetit1vness with other counties as what Orange County could afford to <br /> do. Mr' Thompson said in his research among other counties and municipalities, <br /> most had u "fund" but it was subject to availability of money for projects' <br /> xdd1tinna) comments by the Board included a desire to see 1) the number uf <br /> , <br /> people to he employed; 2) if. the industry we're clean; 3) higher than average wages; <br /> ^ <br /> and, 4) the number of Orange County residents to be employed (i.e, those not to <br /> be brought in from outside)- Commissioner Ni\lhoit mugg6stod that the ''beginning <br /> / <br /> point be that the money advancod"fnr water or sewer lines extension be repaid and <br /> the factors mentioned above could sway the County in that regard. <br /> The Board asked that the Manager check into the ownership question of the lines <br /> ' once built and to investigate with the water/sewer providers in the County pro- <br /> visions they have for extension of lines and tap on feeo. <br /> This item is to be returned to a later agenda. <br /> 7. Commissioner Gustaveson <br /> moved, seconded by Commissioner Whittod, to proclaim November I5-21, lQ82° Children's <br /> Qnuk Week in Orange County, (That Proclamation is on page 19' of this book.) <br /> Vote: Ayes, S; noes, U. <br /> 3` Commissioner Gustavesnn moved, seconded <br /> by Commissioner Marshall, to place the proposed zoning text amendments dealing <br /> with Sections 6.I6-6.1; 6,16.6.2 and 8'I6.12 on the agenda for the Public Hearing <br /> on November 22` 1982' Vote' Ayes, S; noes, O- <br /> 4 <br /> _ Commissioner Qustaveyon moved <br /> to accept the petition to add Dumont Drive to the Participatory Paving Program, Com- <br /> missioner Walker seconded the motion. Vote: Ayes, S; noes, O. (See pages 21~ 24 of <br /> this book for a copy of the petition.) <br /> 5' Commissioner Walker moved, seconded by Commissioner <br /> Quytaveson, to approve the tax refund requests (see page �2 I" of this book for names <br /> and amount) as recommended by the Tax Supervisor. Vote: Ayes, 6; noes, D. <br /> The Manager announced to the Board that County Tax Supervisor Lloyd had <br /> scored the highest of any person in the history of the Institute of Government on <br /> ! the exam for tertiftcatiun of Tax Supervisors. Mr' Lloyd received a round of applause <br /> and congratulations from the Board for his achievement' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.