Browse
Search
Agenda - 10-04-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 10-04-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2017 2:15:06 PM
Creation date
4/4/2017 1:57:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
10/4/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19821004
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Board Members -3- Economic Development Program <br /> "63-20" financing gets its name from an Internal Revenue Service ruling <br /> which set thd ground rules for the practioe. In effect, the ruling gives tax <br /> exempt status to private business facilities similar to revenue bonds. Under <br /> ^63-20" a non-profit corporation constructs and leases a structure. When the <br /> obligations f the corporation are retired by the lease payments of the occupant-, <br /> the facility is treated like a governmental unit. The five conditions that must <br /> be met for 3-20/' financing are: <br /> ---- 1. Tlie corporation must engage in essentially public activities._ ' <br /> 2, The corporation must be non-profit. <br /> 3. The corporation income must not benefit a private person. <br /> 4. The governmental unit must have a "beneficial interest" in the <br /> corporation for while the obligation is being retired and must <br /> � <br /> o�tain full title to the property when indebtedness is retired. <br /> 5. T1.e governmetal unit must approve the corporation and the <br /> igmtions undertaken. <br /> This thod of financing is useful because of the degree of fYeuibflitv <br /> allowed, which does not exist with industrial revenue bonds. There are two <br /> ' <br /> disadvantages: First, the corporation may not wish to have the government own <br /> the facility land second, it is not certain 63-20 financing 1s allowed due to <br /> recent chmng s in North Carolina law. <br /> Conclusions as to Public Financins <br /> The 4tention of the above discussion was to point out some of the possi- <br /> bilities and financial limitations placed on a local government undertaking an <br /> ecunhmic development pn}Bram. The main points are: <br /> 1. T e use of public funds in the Economic Development effort are <br /> restricted by State law and the State Constitution. <br /> 2. Private efforts that do not use public funds are not constrained <br /> bY these laws. <br /> 3. P ivate efforts using public funds must use the funds according <br /> to the State Lawy, <br /> 4. Tbere exists several different financing methods for local govern- <br /> ment to mount an economic development effort. <br /> 5. S me sources of funds necessary for development are not available <br /> in the private sector. <br /> Funcdons of the Economic Develo"ment Pro"ram <br /> There are at least ten functions that any one of the proposed models <br /> would need to carry out. It is reasonable to assume that there would be <br /> revisions toithis list, but it provides a starting point for discussion. An <br /> effort has been made to evaluate the effectiveness with which each model could <br /> be expected io achieve in carrying out the functions. This is a judgment <br /> evaluation staff's part and therefore subject to any revisions that a wider <br /> assessment might show. In the following matrix an asterisk indicates a high <br /> rating of effectiveness per each function. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.