Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-23-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 08-23-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 4:17:27 PM
Creation date
4/3/2017 4:09:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/23/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820823
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4Th <br /> :. . <br /> ,. . . . .,.... . .. . ... . . .. <br /> 0.1.-?../.11iG-F, GOUNTY PL,NNIN-LNC.4 DEPARTMENT <br /> ITILLSBOIZ ou Grc <br /> NOV.Tli CA:110IINA. <br /> 27276 <br /> ) <br /> I.TMO <br /> TO: Richard Uhi,tted, Chairman Board of Commissioners <br /> FR( : Orange County Planning Board <br /> SUBJECT: Time limitcuraapplication fora Special Use Permit for Buck <br /> Duntsdn Development. <br /> DATE: 8/29/B2 <br /> The Planning Board at their August 16, 1982 meeting passed a recom- <br /> mendation asking the Board of Coymissioners to consider the appropriate- <br /> ness of another apolication for a Special Use Permit by Buck Mountain <br /> Davelopment. This question had been raised at the Planning Board meet- <br /> ing on June 21, 1982 and was again asked by a citizen at the public hear- <br /> ing on July a, 1982. <br /> Special Use Permits may allow commercial uses in residential areas <br /> and they co through substantially the same review process as rezoning <br /> requests, Therefore, the Planning Board feels that Special Uses are <br /> arr2ndrmts to the Zoning Ordinance and came under the requirements of <br /> that article of the Ordinance. If they are considered amendments then <br /> there should be a one year waiting period after denial of an applica- <br /> tion. <br /> The motion was: Toe Planning Board has serious questions about the <br /> legality of a reconsideration of the Special Use Permit request for Buck <br /> Mountain Development at this tine. The Board feels theta one year period <br /> should elapse before reconsideration, Motion by Irvin, second by Kizer. <br /> Vote [linfavor, 2 opposed, 2 abstained ' <br /> RC/dg <br /> . . <br /> . .. . <br /> .. ..... . .. . . . . . . _. _ . . <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.