Agenda - 08-23-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

°� ��C ; ' , Hr. Cline said the company was in agreement with all requirements except the 40,000 so' ft required and mentioned previously, There were no other comments from the audience on the proposed text changes . to the Zoning Ordinance, either pro or con. S Proposed Changes to the Subdivision Regulations. . Nr. Cannity made the presentation for the Planning Staff, saying there were four me_ .r changes proposed: �| 1. addition of definitions of road types that coincide with the NC DOT definitions; 2, definition of a lot of record in reference to subdivision requirements; J. revisions to road rights of way to coincide with revised HCDOT standards (this also allows us to propose a reduction of private road rights of way requirements); 4, deletion of Section VII Variances. } There were no comments from the audience on the proposed text changes to the Subdivision Regulations, either pro or con. Mn' Crawford turned the meeting over to Chairman Vhitted for the recommendation from the Planning Board on the Class A Special Use Permit Request from Buck Mountain Development Company for the Midway Airport. Chairman Vhitted declared the Quarterly Joint Public Hearing with the Orange County Planning Board adjourned and declared the public hearing on the Bock Mountain Development Company for a Class A Special Use Permit for a General Aviation Airport (Midway) opened. The purpose is to receive the recommendation from the Planning Board on the aforementioned request; Ms, Crawford was sworn (see pages of these minutes). /Clerk's note: The following, until otherwise noted, is a verbatim transcript of ;s. Crmwford's testimonyj Ms. Crawford: Chairman Hhitted, members of the Board, I want to bring the following concerns to your attention, prior to making the Planning Board's recommendation on the Special Use Permit Request by the Buck Mountain. At our August 10, 1982, the following motion was made: "The Planning Board has serious questions about the legality of the reconsideration of the Special Use Permit request by Buck Mountain Development at this time' The Board feels that a one year period should elapse before a reconsideration, The motion was made by Dr. Irvin, seconded by Dr. Kizer; the vote was four in favor, two opposed, and two abstentions As indicated in the memo to you, dated August 29th, this is impossible, dated August 23rd, The Planning Board previous to this meeting and pre- vious to the second public hearing on this request, in addition, it was raised by a citizen at the second public hearing. Futhermore, we have just seen a ,eu- �st by the Staff to amend our Ordinance, in agreement with the Planning Board's mation. Th• memo to you indicates 1h�t special uses require changes in our Zoning Ordinance and requires a public hearing. They are similar in that respect to zoning amendments and therefore should be in accordance with the section on amendments as it corrently reads, which requires a one year period before