Agenda - 08-23-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

48'd , . ,,..) (-: ,c...: : 0--;:,,-..---,---f. . cl: C.:a 1 , [L : i.0., C-5 ;:',.^... .:,:::: ;,.;;,?..:T';`■ I.!;:I 1,:;:.;';:,.:,N.:-.7.i: _________ ilT 1):1 _1\ur_u )3,_.1-932,-- S,°... Proposed text changes to the Subdivision Regulations planing 1 , PUblic U.I.Kiring: T!..s 1: 1\tant(5) : pages of regulations InforiOci COntact: Rick Cannitv with changes underlined. - ________:_________ P cr• 1- 7 1 Pbona NuITisar: 7 3 2-8 18 1 e. xt. 347 _ PailP057.]:: To receive citizen input on several proposed changes to the Subdivision Regulations, NEED: There are four major changes proposedz 1„ addition of definitions of road types that coincide with N-C, DOT definitions 2, definition of a lot of record in reference to subdivision requirements 3, revisions to road rights of way to coincide with revised - NC DOT standards (this a3so allows us to propose a reductio of private road right of way requirements) 4. deletion of Section VII Variances The addition of the road types will make the Subdivision Regulatic; definitions the same as the Department of Transportation, which will facilitate understanding. The lot of record concept is used to determine the administrative procedure a subdivision must go through for approval. The Department of Transportation has recently reduced the right of way requirements for secondary ro,'s, The proposed changes reflect the new requirements- The recinixo It for private road rights of way have also been reduced. The se( )1. that sets out variance procedures should not have been included In the subdivision Regulations, The State enabling legislation does not allog variation from the specific standards of the Sub- d.Li.lion Regulations ; therefore, ' t should be deleted.