Agenda - 08-17-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

` - ' oMcZuDco�Y �� � ~`= ^ FOAM OF Action � ACTION AGENDA zT&MmBSTPACT Item u- [� Iozmaln»uE August 17, 1982 Discussion Items Relating to the 1932'83 Budget • l • Ra er \ | Public 8oa�ng` � oo' / T�"nr�=�� Couxty naq� . . '-_ ------�- AEtachor2nE( ' zq�zrma�on Contact: s) ' Yes Kenneth R. Thompson 732-8181 ext. E01 _��ne m��er: �Oa�s� To conSider and receive any policy d rection on four subjects wk u e � discussion f hwh h wnth Board requested be held over fur further d cu��`on rom rne uoyc� ,k sessions. NEED: Areas of interest were as follows: l. Planning Department Objectives for l982-83 The list which appeared in the recommended budget was considered too general and abbreviated_ Some things thought important from past statements appeared to be left out. Staff has since re-written the list in terms of the comments received (See Attachment 1). Any modifications can be indicated at the meeting. = = 2' Commission on Hnmen Objectives for 1982-83 The work program for the new year was not completed in time to be included. A draft of what is proposed is shown in Attachment Z Any revisions should similarly be indicated. 3. 1982-83 Capital Projects Board action was limited to approving the transfer to the County Capital Projects Fund with the understanding that approval of specific projects would occur later. Attachment 3 jS what was developed from departmental input. Attachment 4 is a revised recommendation from the former list while setting aside $7`030 for word processing and $lD,0ODfor contingency. If the 0nrrd agrees with the revision approval should be given to budge; amend- ment shown as Attachment 4. Note the format is changed per Hard instruc tion to transfer vehicle and equipment items to the dopartm'otal budgets 4. Energy Coordinator/Management Analyst Position Included in the recommended budget was moving of the Energy Coordinator position to the Manager's Office. Reconstituted duties were to include doing management studies, continuing staff support to the Energy and other Board-appointed commissions (HSAC, Youth Task Force), and administering the pblevidnn franchises. Energy and HSAC Commission members asked questions as to the ornont of time which could be devoted to their activities' The Mnnag, . `s answer was that staff time would be allocated in relation to th,> work programs developed. This would be on a project rather than a fixed percentage basis. Also it was stated that the Energy/ Management Analyst, as well as other staff members could be assigned to give assistance depending on the nature of the tasks. Subse,na»t meetings w' the chairman of the commissions have been devoted to discussing mechanics of how this might be done to the satisfaction x� eac: Job description for the position is Attachment 5. Any revision deSirc : by the Board can be incor' urstedjnto a memorandum of understanding ohiwhir.should exist between each Commission assisted and the Manaper(Attnchoeot IMPACT: Board guidance in these subject areas will he reflected in the final, printed budget. �' - ' . ' 8s the Board decides.