. • ;44t.,-Vii'ii.,.;:;-:!....i,'!:.. : . ::
<br /> ' .!'!..:• .V.:' .,:=.P,,. . •
<br /> .: 1,,., .:.: ':.'. . •
<br /> , • 11/4:'':41's..
<br /> ' .
<br /> . ,
<br /> Planning Board Neeing 4 July 17, 1978 . . .
<br /> •
<br /> Mr. Cleary asked Mr. Fine, the developer, if he intended to have an
<br /> entrance from the property to Highway 86. Mr. Fine said he did not plan to .„.:
<br /> exit on 86.; He added that he was going to work with the Health Department i , •:
<br /> to find sites fOr the septic tanks.
<br /> . , !
<br /> Dr. Bomar mentioned that a 100' setback from the road frontage had been . .
<br /> previously required by the Board because of the hog farm operation across "
<br /> the road. Re suggested notifying future buyers of the hog farm situation. , •
<br /> , , .
<br /> [ . .
<br /> .
<br /> Mr. Strayhorn,:operater of the farm across the road expressed concern
<br /> over road access from the 4 lots and the fact that no entrance from 86 had
<br /> been planned.
<br /> •.
<br /> Mr. Minis told the Board that the staff had, recognized ,the future . .,
<br /> 1
<br /> . :
<br /> development potential of the property, but that the topography of the land
<br /> mandated the lot arrangement on the road.
<br /> _
<br /> Mr. Fine told the Board that lots 1 and 2 would have direct access
<br /> to the State road. The staff"recommended that lot 3 and 4 use the proposed
<br /> new road and that la covenant be arranged so that lot 5 could have access to • .
<br /> the proposed road.
<br /> Mr. Dobelstein moved approval of the proposal subject to staff recom-
<br /> mendations with previsions for an indication of notification to potential
<br /> buyers of the hog farm situation.- Mr. Cleary seconded the motion. Mr. Efland
<br /> _: _said that the Board could stipulate that lot 5 use the old sawmill rOaeaS ,''''..:-
<br /> an easement.
<br /> The Board voted unanimously in favor of the motion. .
<br /> I . . .
<br /> ..
<br /> Mr. Efland suggested that any minor subdivision with future development
<br /> , ..
<br /> . .
<br /> " potential be brought to the attention of the Board.
<br /> . .
<br /> , .
<br /> Mr. Strayhornlauggested that the Board had created the only means of .
<br /> , access with the approval of a minor subdivision.
<br /> 5. Bane 7 Rezoning
<br /> r
<br /> . . -
<br /> Mr. Bane's request is to rezone 105 acres out of a 260 acre tract in . . .
<br /> . _
<br /> Eno Township. lie is requesting that the property be rezoned General Commer-
<br /> cial from Residential, - The tract is located along State Road 1713. •. . ,
<br /> 'll
<br /> Mr. Kirk told the Board that a traffic count was not available. He , ..
<br /> added that the width of the road had been measured and was from 20- 22 feet.
<br /> . .
<br /> A Department (4 Transportation engineer had told the staff that the
<br /> road would not be upgraded unless it was needed. The Board heard that . .-
<br /> Southern Railroad lid recocrnended a 50' spur width. The developer would
<br /> . .
<br /> to build the spurs.
<br /> .4
<br /> 1 :
<br /> Mr. Minis told the Board that the iodations of the access roads and
<br /> . .
<br /> railroad spurs would need work. He added that Mount Hermon Road was a/ready-
<br /> feeling the effects of heavy truck traffic.
<br /> ..._ .... ..-
<br /> _ .
<br /> :,..:''.,,:zi`1' . • •'I
<br /> --'"'
<br /> I , .:, .. •-:, I
<br /> •
<br /> ::,z,-.::,,..,..,.• ! ' .:,;.. .,..-- ..—...,.:-.L:..1.;,,,,i,..41,.,. t, l....:...- ' ,,-'-‘,.,:•.,, ----,•---' -A-,
<br />
|