Agenda - 08-17-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

07_,',•:GE CCUNV 17..:2 ;f: c'F f.::-; :-:1S;;I.C>:•!:7-7:5 i,-..:t io a [L,-.:.;,%. 1 -4) -.PC.il:':-. .:::.;::77,-',.7‘ WEN 1(2C.:i / TING sty ,--• PI.-quest by Fred b Elizabeth Cates for rezoning fron Pesidential-1 (P-1) to Tlesidential -, 8 (1::-3) _____ PO L De p7a-7.1-71-4::t: Planninc J I 1.3T.dic7: Paarig: yas i - -------------- r_ AttacIhMent(S) : .ppl4cation forms - pg. 1-4 InrorFoation Gonta-L.: Rick Cannity Location Nap/tax mao-pg. 5,6 Phone NuL-ber: 732-8161 ENT. 347 ____ • PURPOSE: To receive the Planning Board recommendation concerning ,an application for a rezoning. from Residential-1 (R-1) to Pesidential-8 (11-8) NEED: This item was deferred until this meeting from B/2/82 . The applicant has requested high density res.L1 cal (P-8) designation for prcTerty located in Hillsborough Township off Orange Grove Fond, just south of 1-85 the property is P/0 Lot 26 block B Map 38 and is shorn on Tax rap 42, Hillsborough Township. The total tract is 115 acres, about 40 acres of which lies south of 1-85. Property to the east and vest has been developed by the applicant with 43 epartN::-. .t units on G acres of land. Hillsborough Town water and sanitary sewer service is available to the site. 1'1E:ACT: The rezoning request is in general conformance with the Orange County Land Use Plan. However, the high density development allowed under the .T17.8 designation may have adverse impacts on the existing developaent in this area. The rezoning request does not address the following important concerns: 1. Fire protection for the existing units and for those proposed. Development at this density should have fire hydrants no further than 500 by road from every unit. 2. There are no receational facilities existing on the site, there are none proposed, If approved there would be a total of 60 _ units with no recreational area. 3. There is no provision for central services, with the number of units there should be sore provision for laundry facilities and central trash disposal. 4. There is no pedestrian circulation system linking the units to one another, to trash disposal sites and to the gain rends. 5e Streets nay not be hard surfaced nor adequate to handle the amount of:: trafceic generated by the number ed units allowed. 6. Parkin(,-.1 would have to be provided according to the Zoning OrC/, ncee P. ever, the existing paring spaces back -;.:1y out into the travel way. This is an unsafe sii,oation and will become worse if the rezoning is aonyover3. le Lb a rezoning -', ,.7.2 building to building setbacks are governed ly section 6,12 but there will be no landscaping requires. ne applicant has prc. i_ded riniral landscaping around the cwisting unit:.... The ,Ate, is presently grm,m up in lobolly pine. . ,