Agenda - 08-17-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

38E 2. Revise the prioritization policy for all new requests to distinguish between subdivision/residential and rural, road and prioritize subdivision/residential roads above rural roads. Rural roads would he paved either as funds permit or on the basis of a combined fundino and waiting period. formula ie. as funds permits and within five years of the date of request. 3. Revise the policy no that for new requests all rural roads would be ineligible for the County paving program. 4. Split the annual allocation for P.P.F. into two parte: one for subdivision/resdiential roads and the other for rural roads. IMP2).CT: The Board's decision would either reaffirm existing policy with no change in the Program or revise the policy appli- cable to new requests.. RECOPMENDATTON: Staff recommends policy option 3, This option recognizes that the prograr was designed to provide a means to pave unpaved, subdivision and residential roads, not rural roads, through owner participation. 71?-4 ORANGE COTINT7 PLNDTThTG 1)EPA1TMENT111 1-''---- rraa.sBovOUGH NORTM CArtOLII,TA 27276 _ • MEMORANDUM TO Ken Thompson, County Manager FROM: Susan Smith, Planning Department DATE: July 16, 1982 SUBJECT: Libscomb Grove Church Road On July 14, at 6:00 P.M. , I met with residents of Libscomb Grove Church Road at Libsoomb Grove Church to discuss the new DOT policy on rural road' and the road's status i the Participatory Paving Program projects 1. St, DOT point system an 1982-83 Secondary Roads Improvement Program. Twelve residents of Libscomb Grove Church Road attended the meeting. Those attending the meeting voted unanimously for withdrawal from the Participatory Paving Program in light of scheduled construction .. and paving of the road by DOT during the 1982-83 and 1983-84 construction ye:.irs. I have attached the sign-up sheet for those attending the meeting.