Browse
Search
Agenda - 08-02-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 08-02-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 3:53:16 PM
Creation date
4/3/2017 3:30:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
8/2/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820802
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Joseph I. nassif, architect , aia <br /> p,0. box 26151 chapel hill, h.c. 27514= 919-942-4645 <br /> July 29, 1982 <br /> Mr. Bill Laws, Assistant Manager <br /> Orange County Government <br /> 106 E. Margaret Lane <br /> Hiiisborougi?, N.C. 27278 <br /> Re: Change Order: Jail Facility <br /> Hillsborough, N.C. <br /> Project Number: 7603-08, File: A-2 <br /> Dear Mr. Laws; <br /> This is to confirm that we have transmitted to you this date by hand <br /> delivery three letters from Security Building Company dated 27 July, <br /> 28 July and 8 July 1982. These three letters have to do with the <br /> recent requested change In the old jail facility relating to the sub- <br /> soil under the old concrete slab. <br /> The first letter dated July 27, 1982, deals with excavation and re- <br /> placement with Chapel Hill gravel and is in the amount of $8,785.00. <br /> The second letter dated July 28, 1982, deals with the concrete abut- <br /> ments recommended by Freehling & Robertson, Inc. and is In the amount <br /> of $i,548.001 The final letter is in the amount of $2,928,00 and is <br /> Security Building's feeling that they are due more money because their <br /> original estimate of the job had the concrete slab being four Inches <br /> to five inches thick and as It turned out it was greater than eight <br /> inches or ap roximately a foot deep. <br /> I do not recignize this as a legitimate item since it Is up to the con- <br /> tractors to inspect the premises and to ask questions they may have at <br /> the time. If there was any doubt the contractor should request from the <br /> architect an the owners rather than indicating an estimate. Estimate„ <br /> are not sail factory unless so stipulated on their bid. Therefore, I <br /> will deny the request from this office. <br /> As you aid I discussed it appears that the amount requested for the concrete <br /> abutment of $3,548.00 is relatively in line. " However, as we also discussed <br /> with the addltional fill and concrete slab to be added as well as a new con- <br /> tainment wall �on the exterior of the building it would seem that these abut- <br /> ments would niet be necessary. In calling Froehling & Robertson and speaking <br /> to Mr. Hood, we discussed the merits of not placing the abutments as they re- <br /> quested. Mr. Hood strongly indicated to me that he would be a no position to <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.