Orange County NC Website
Browse       Search
�»�� <br /> ��� <br /> interest on the part of the County to provide an airport to meet the demand <br /> that exists in the County for the ypmie- Mr. Matthews cited the North <br /> Carolina Airport System Study as the basis for the demand for regional air- <br /> port services in Orange County' Consequently, private development of this <br /> airport was encouraged given the above reasons, <br /> Mr' Irvin: Directed questions regarding the dear and approach zones to <br /> Mr. Matthews saying, that as he understood Matthews' letter of June 29, 1982, <br /> Bock Mountain Developers wbuld be required to control a distance of 1000' clear <br /> zone from the end of the runway plus 200' approach zone, making a distance of <br /> 1200' from the end of the runway to be controlled by Buck Mountain Development <br /> Corporation. Mr. Irvin cited the figure of 20;1 for rise in the approach zone <br /> (including the lOUO' clear zone), saying the rise for the I200' would be GD'. <br /> Mr' Matthews: Said that was not correct that the rise would be 50'. He <br /> elaborated saying: <br /> We would begin at run�ay elevation and gm out 200' at runway elevation <br /> so we have a rise of 0' /-zero feet/ for that first 200. The clear zone <br /> is defined by FAA as the-first 1000' of the approach surface or the point <br /> at which the approach surface is 60' above ground level . Assuming that we <br /> have a completely flat terrain, that would mean per at the ]OOO' mark' From <br /> the beginning of the approach surface to the IOOU' mark, the approach sur- <br /> face would rise SU'; so that the point 1200' from the runway the approach <br /> surface would be 50' above runway elevation. <br /> Mr. Irvin; Cited the heights of two different trees (loblolly pine and <br /> tulip ) noting that each grows to a reasonable average height of 100'. He suggested <br /> that someone who owns land in the approach might have trees of that size which <br /> would penetrate the approach zone. <br /> Mr. Matthews: Agreed but added that "The approach surface is a relative <br /> height; the absolute height of the treo'..is of very little importance at this <br /> point. Rather the relative height of the tree''ab.,for example, if one went <br /> out this 1000' if the ground at that point were 50' lower than the runway, we <br /> could have a lDU' tall tree a I000^ from the end of the runway and it would not <br /> penetrate through the approach surface." <br /> Mr. Irvin: Replied that then the converse must also be true, i.e., if the <br /> _ <br /> ground slopes upward the tree height would have to be added. <br /> Mr. Matthews: Replied that each site must be considered independently; that <br /> they would actually go out and measure the heights of the trees in the approach <br /> areas. <br /> Planning Board Chair Pat Crawford: Asked if NCDUT would then modify its <br /> requirements' <br />