Browse
Search
Agenda - 07-19-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 07-19-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 3:51:47 PM
Creation date
4/3/2017 3:24:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/15/1982
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820719
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. . <br /> � <br /> ~9� `.. . <br /> - <br /> t. particular were probably "fairly indicative" of the County-wide demand for such <br /> o set-vice since anyone could Qn to HWA and take the flight training from any <br /> of the planes based there- Mr. Matthews feels the estimates are reliable as <br /> planning figures at this point' <br /> Hr. Kizer: Asked Mr. Matthews why the Division of Aviation preferred the <br /> method of traffic calculation based on the annual operations rather than the <br /> method "derivative of the number of airplanes." <br /> Mr' Matthews: "It is the operation that generates the traffic, not the <br /> airport . . We are more comfortable with a traffic generation tied to the actual <br /> activity of the airport itself." <br /> Mr, Kizer; "How did you get 5'8 trips?" <br /> Mr' Matthews: Replied that DOT highway engineers in the "Planning and Research <br /> Branch" provided the figures for him at his request; specifying that Mr. Springer" <br /> one of the engineers, said the "text references" used by DOT cited those figures <br /> and, Mr' Matthews added, would be used by DOT engineers for any airport in the <br /> State. <br /> Planning Board member Irvin: Asked Mr. Matthews in his "positiun" for DOT <br /> what he considered to be his principle function. <br /> Mr. Matthews: ~0 ensure that there are adequate airport facilities in t <br /> State to meat the requirements that are imposed upon such airports by the My/.!g <br /> public and by the communities," <br /> Mr, Irvin: Asked if airport safety was not important. <br /> Mr' Matthews: Replied that safety was #1 priority in arty project. <br /> Mr. Irvin: Told Mr, Matthews that, in his opinion, Mr' Matthews' letter of <br /> June 29^ I982, to then Planning Director Jim Polmtty, seemed to be biased in favor <br /> of the Midway Airport and seemed to convey the opinion that the Planning Department <br /> was "unreasonable" in the recommendations it mode with regard to the approach <br /> " <br /> requirements' Mr' Irvin asked Mr. Matthews if he'd have written the same letter <br /> if he, Matthews, had been the "recipient of a petition signed by 600 concerned <br /> and somewhat irate" citizens of Bingham Township? <br /> Mr Matthews: Said that he could not say what he'd have written had he <br /> been a member of the Planning Board and that he was not a member of the Board <br /> of Cr ' :i,uionars either. He said his office favors the Midway Airport because <br /> of ;'�veral factors: an unwillingness on the part of the public to either <br /> expand or continue HNA operations; and that his office had not seen evidence of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.