Agenda - 07-19-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

x, Williams and the proposed Midway airport were wrong and that other sites-woul.d.T be preferable. �Canni.ty submitted tuo letters from Peloquin Associates for the Boards' infor- mation. Matted submitted letters from Martha and John Harris, Fischer family and Robert Fischer. the public hearing on Midway Airport adjourned at 10;25. The record of the public hearing would remain open for suhnittal of the referenced items given as evidence. Crawford requested sted that the public hearing remain open for the Board to questjo Bruce Mathews and asked the staff to request his presence at the July 19 Planning Board meting. The Board of County Corctussioners would also be pre-- sent for this matter. Wallhoit moved adjournment of the public hearing. tharshall seconded.. Motion passed unanimously. Agenda Item B. Re ama ng �Ra s frc m Fred and Elizabeth Cates (Fran Rl. to Rs) Cannity presented a description of the proposal and its Location. He explained the intent of the provision of districts in the Zoning ordinance. He noted that the proposal in conformance with the Land Use plan, but that there would be adverse impacts of the prqposa� R8 rezoning. Cannity added that a rezon- ing cannot address the following concerns; fare prrtecticn,. recreational facilities, central services, pedestrian circulation, interior cirucl.ation, parking, building to building setback and an overall developgent plan to assure adequate services and amass to the remainder of the tract. The staff recut •Tended denial of tha rezoning request. John btAdams, consultant to the developer, indicated this was a request to rezone four acres adjacent to the existing R8 development of Cates Farm. He noted that the developments was caught under the enforcement of the revised Zoning Ordinance and that the rezoning request would enable the continuance of the development according to the original plan for 32 units using the same vehicular access as the existing 48 units. M=Adam; addressed the staff comment regaxdng the proposal.. He indicated that it was the intent of the developer to Provide recreational facilities and that trash removal ar4 fire protection would be provided in the same manner as established for the fi rat 48 units. He emphasized that the existing developmr=nt provides the knowledge of the standard and that 80 units would provide for the feasibility of recreation management: and maintenance as intended and orginally conceived ved and planned. Kizer asked whether the roads would be paved. McAdams responded that there would be surface treatment of the road =mrnly referred to a Wi llhoit: inquired about the commitment of the Town to water and sir pro- vision. McAdams indicated the Tbwn was willing to extend lines sized for this purpose from the orginal. 48 units. Willhoit. asked if the Town's commitment was docLumntec7. Cannity responded negatively. Wil twit emphasized the inv ortanCe of the availability of.services. McAdams stated that it was the tap charge not the availability of services which was in question. He explained that under a 1973-74 agreement regarding liras to Grady Brown School there is a surcharge of $200.00 per tab collected by the Tow and for- warded to the Orange County School Board. The issue in this matter is t-hz?