Browse
Search
Agenda - 07-19-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 07-19-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 3:51:47 PM
Creation date
4/3/2017 3:24:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/15/1982
Meeting Type
Public Hearing
Document Type
Agenda
Document Relationships
Minutes - 19820719
(Linked To)
Path:
\Board of County Commissioners\Minutes - Approved\1980's\1982
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
N� DRAFT. <br /> Miriam Murdock - Resident of Bingham Township. mardock stressed the ina- <br /> pprvpriatenes of this location for an airport. She added the residents <br /> sympathized with .residents near Horace William but noted that the Bingham, <br /> residents preceeded the airport and the difference between 50 based <br /> aircraft and 276 hangared plus tie c4 craft. Murdock referenced the <br /> designation of the areas,' for agricultural and rural residential uses <br /> and questioned the impact on property values. Murdock sited inadequate <br /> highway services, demands on the local tax burden, land consm-el by a <br /> nortb/south highway, the Lack of service provided to Hillsborough and <br /> northern Orange County, that only 10% of FDU pilots served would move <br /> to a site near 1-85, the potential for project failure and the advantages <br /> of sites on 1--85/U'S 70, particularly the site recently advertised for sale. <br /> Wallace Kaufman - real estate appraiser. Kaufman .indicated he was not an <br /> amTediate property owner but an apprai.sor addressing the question of air- <br /> ports and land values. Kaufman described his credentials and experience <br /> in making a sttatewmt on this matter of impact on property values. He <br /> responded to three sep4Wate issues. 1) How do su_`r•,rotrx i ng property uses <br /> react to any airport expansion? Citing local examples at Research Tri.ange <br /> Park and the expansion of RW, objections to intensive or expanded use of <br /> Horace Williams Airport and. the halt on military runs in parts of Chatham <br /> County he noted that values will dro as taste and attitude affect real <br /> estate value and investment . 2 ) Viat crea#,s value in land near the airport? <br /> Kaufman noted the desireability for residential development in rural, quiet <br /> sparsely developed areas raises values and protects and enhances values. <br /> 3) Mat deteratrines the value of one home vs. another home near an airport? <br /> The airport lowers values of homes already there and remains undisturbed <br /> by residential uses. Kaufman addressed the concept of compensation by <br /> either zoning all the areas industrial and there,'ay raising all Propel <br /> values or changing one piece of land for industry and thereby devaluing <br /> land for residential use. He noted that approval would clearly affect <br /> land value and the highest AFle was residential use inc autpatible with <br /> raising the value of the airport land. Speculation of the air port <br /> land would raise its value while lowering the value of Vpn. Speculation of <br /> surrounding land. He stressed that this view was documented.nted. by canon <br /> sense and literature. He added that the County needs an airport but that <br /> other areas are mere suitable and land would not be devalued at these <br /> areas: where there has been an unanswerd demand for develop rent. <br /> Bland Simpson - Resident of Bingham 'Township. Simpson urged. 40UAt of <br /> request. and submitted a letter from Dr. and Mrs. slriepler for the record.. <br /> Simpson cited Section 8.8.2 of the zoning ordinance as containing the <br /> di.. :tionary power of the Board. to weigh and assess evidence for car <br /> pliance or lack (with the Zoning ordinance and due process. He 641*4 <br /> Section 8.2.2b) must stUe surrounding area due to nature of use ie. air- <br /> planes. He noted for Mx. Shoepler that several buyers had withdrawn <br /> offers for his land due to the airport proposal., Ihereby causing economic <br /> and psychological effects. Simcpson noted. Hazzard's statement at the last. <br /> public hearing that the land is worthless for anything but planes, respoazding <br /> that the orange County Soil Survey (pps 601-65) references soils of this <br /> type as having high p04tial for cram, soybeans, and timber among other. <br /> Simpson cited the Naticn3 Agricultural Sands Stud : IIhe Protection of <br /> Farmland: A fernce (lade Book for State and Local wgenment Apps. 34- <br /> 35 with regard to the "impermanence »ndmm (which) leads to a reduction <br /> in on going investment in land inprovements and farm structures and in- <br /> creases the unevitabi,.l.ity of the end of agriculture." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.