Agenda - 07-19-1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Y E dvrinrr�� beacon would be installedil phase l. al tted askEk if total based aircraft would be 276. Hazzard indicated yes- at point the as-rport �1d be financially feasible ie. Whitted at what po' wt�ulcl be a 9-10 month negative the breakevm point. Hazzard. cash flow. ' a=Cra.ft aircraft and any number Crawford noted there Wcx�].d be 27� ht�nga�:�d of ti edowns; Crawford rice. if Hazzard quarreled With the estimated per- centage of transient aircraft. Hazzard re ponds i no adding hangari.ng gives 10--20� reduction in i.nsuranre. He noted there would be a trade off bebeeen security and less maintenance. Crawford inquired about hangar dimensions. Hazzard resF=1ed he did not know them. jCrawford asked what construction materials would be used. Hazzard indicated they were investigatigating mad me nance-(fM siding. Crawford as)�ed if hangars would be on paving or grass. Hazzard resp d paving would extend up to and between hangar67, Wherever planes would go. He ed�d that the bight concern ern would be fire protection access. Irvin askedi if the l$ million figure included hangars and acres road construction. Hazzard responded that it did not include the access road as this wasl a small. cost. He added access roads would be paved lit and as hands are sold. Crawford emhpasi.zed the condition that all of phase 1 be leted in a specified period of tine. Irvin asked the estimated cost of a hangar. Hazzard indicated he would not providei those figures as he Would be seling these hangars. Kite= noted, the haangars would be sold or leased. as necessary to make mommy. Members of the audience were asked to give evidence an the propo l.s. Miriam Sin I -� resident of Bingham Township; owner' of recently bought and :rem a= farmhouse: leasor of 10 acres under cultivation. Singer contested assertion of no adverse .impact of airport on adjacent l.an4ises from experience of living near an airport. She. cited major nuance po- tential of Eproposed number of hangared craft, and unspecified number of tid'�0:)wns. She expressed, concern regarding impact. on NC 54 citing heavy traffic at present. Singer urged denial of proposal.. Dr. nnas Griggs - representative of orange Grove. Fire Company Board of Directors. Griggs sutaai.tted Board's letter at rest of 'resident Ed Johnson• As genial. oamTent Griggs indicated the anxiety of both fire- fighters ark. Board mfrs with regard to the prgxzal citing Co�any Was o to defend residential �. He referenced the contactual a� th the Board of.County C..cmmissionexs to provide fire protection to all uses and the considerable elevation of responsibilities and Capa- bilities 56ggested by this project. Griggs specified the five Board axm=s 4A recommendations: l) Water Availability -- the required 30,000 and gallon capac01 could be provided by ponds serving as drainage arnars sulaple�rented Wells in dry WG1k : He asked that these measures be guaraM- teed prior to permitting. 2) Water Movement - Griggs noted the need for all weather access, dry hydrants and tanks and pumps necessary of apparatus for slmtf .i' water to hangars. 3) 'die need for a high expansion phone r' to be supplied by project. 4) Griggs specified a number of safety features in the hangars. 5) The provision of an access road off Teer Pnad is needed mar.i-3m.a.7 arw aiven the recent air crash in a remote area..