Browse
Search
Agenda - 07-08-1982
OrangeCountyNC
>
Board of County Commissioners
>
BOCC Agendas
>
1980's
>
1982
>
Agenda - 07-08-1982
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 3:30:02 PM
Creation date
4/3/2017 3:17:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
BOCC
Date
7/8/1982
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Agenda
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
170
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
| — ' '-------' <br /> � <br /> +���`v�� <br /> ~ ' ~ <br /> �^� � <br /> Mr. John Northern: Attorney for Buck Mountain, said the company was a <br /> general partnership and the reference to Incorporated should be dropped. <br /> Mr. Irvin: Wished to know how much land was under the control of Buck <br /> Mountain with regard to the approach departure surface and how much more land <br /> they controlled to the extent of being able "to invade to cut trees." <br /> Mr. Mehler: Replied that the majority of the land off each runway to 1000' <br /> are controlled and that for the"slight bit of land that is not, we accept as <br /> condition for approval." He added that in this type of project there were people <br /> who would not give their approval until the project had been approved. He con- <br /> tinued saying, that the FAA and DOT considered the amount of land presently con- <br /> trolled fair and that therefore, they would not try to obtain more. <br /> Mr. Irvin: Asked if Mr. Mehler could be more specific about control to the <br /> south of the runway and to highway 54. <br /> Mr. John Northern: Said he would be glad to speak to that. He pointed out <br /> on a map the limits of the land owned or controlled by the developer. He said <br /> that if the Board of Commissioners decided that the amount of land to be controlled <br /> by the applicant was 1000' from the runway then it would be incumbent on the <br /> applicant to shift or shorten the runway to get the required controlled distanc ,' <br /> Mr' Northern added that the Orange County Zoning Ordinance does not define the <br /> approach zone and that it would be difficult to get easements for one mile. He <br /> continued that the applicants feel that 1000' was the "appropriate zone" of approach <br /> and that "basically" it would depend on what the Board of Commissioners decided. <br /> Mr. Irvin: Suggested that the developer had control up to highway 54 but <br /> not beyond that. <br /> Mr. Northern: Yes. <br /> Mr, Irvin: Asked if the property controlled extended north into the Crawford <br /> property line. <br /> Mr. Northern: Said they controlled the Walton tract but not the Crawford tract. <br /> And he does not remember the width of the Walton tract but feels that it is specffie' <br /> on one of the maps. <br /> Continuing along another line of responses, Mr. Northern said that he could <br /> talk in general about the maintenance fees, but he does not want to specify detailed <br /> financial planning. He said he would not_like to discuss how much the airport e4ects <br /> | to make, or charge in specific situations, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.